prompt
listlengths 2
2
| ground_truth
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: To me, online entertainment is such a flip of a coin. You either get a partnership or you don't, and even if you do get the partnership, there's no saying that it will last,\" he said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday (Sept 8). The streaming service has managed to maintain its momentum amid stiff competition from rivals like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video after securing exclusive rights for shows including The Witcher and Bridgerton - two fantasy series based off books by Polish author Andrzej Sapkowski. They have also released projects featuring popular franchises such as Resident Evil and Assassin's Creed.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Solely out of curiosity, just how much public funding do you think it needs? There is already a substantial amount being spent. What sort of number do you have in mind as adequate?', \"I would like to point out that government funding agencies like NSF have no influence from politicians. How it is allocated is decided entirely by scientists. Often volunteers who read proposals and don't even work for the agency (they might get paid, not sure but they aren't real employees). They only way a politician could influence this us decreasing the amount if money the while funding agency had to dispense. If course there might be indirect pressure but I actually don't think there if much influence on it. Edit: words,There are a lot of fees and permitting costs associated with these actions, as well as liability to clean up environmental damage caused. Research funding will be less effective for this type of thing, and it is necessary for our economy.', \"The entities responsible for these things are usually pumping so much money into the economy, that it's not worth fighting them (according to people in politics),\" \"While these issues are important to consider, it is also very important to consider the legislation that currently guides scientific research. Industrial pollution does get a lot of public funding for research. Research is necessitated under NEPA if any federal funding is given to a project. This is the case with sewage treatment plants, for instance. Industrial pollution is also given analysis when a project (private or public), threatens to impact the health of ecological systems or people living near a site. Even more specifically, here in my state in the USA, the DEQ has been involved in deciding whether or not to grant permits to Intel that would like to expand their factories. Intel needs to acquire permits because their production produces fluoridated gas, which is a green house gas. So, I suppose that the reasons really depend on where the environmental issue falls in your state's legislation. I am assuming that your concern is that fracking negatively impacts ground water, which I am sure is the case. Bottom line, legislation drives research through agencies such as the EPA in the United States, and if research is not being done, perhaps it is due to the land being privately owned. It is important to also take a look at what research is currently being done, as there is a lot.,\" \"Drilling for fossil fuels and industrial waste are not new concepts. What is new, is the method and frequency of hydraulic fracking. As a society, we have been tempered to ignore the waste of our modernity. Media ignores it because it's an old story that no one (mainstream America) cares about.,Fracking was invented because of US government funding] (URL0) 100 million in cash and billions in tax breaks since 1975.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Sometimes when people are scared or sad, they look for someone or something to blame to try to make sense of what is happening. In this case, some people are blaming the European Union (EU) because they feel like it is the EU's responsibility to take care of the migrants who are coming. However, other people think that the leaders from the migrants' countries are actually causing the problems that make people want to leave, and that they should be the ones responsible for fixing things. It can be complicated to understand, but it's important to remember that it's usually not just one person or group's fault when things go wrong. There are usually a lot of different factors that contribute to a problem, and it takes everyone working together to try to make things better.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: One of my favorite pizza places. The location is understated as it is in a strip mall but it is not a reflection of the quality of food or atmosphere inside. Great wood fired pizza and wine list. Its a great place for a casual dinner with family or friends.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: John was incensed about what he perceived as an abrogation of his customary right as monarch to influence the election. He complained both about the choice of Langton as an individual, as John felt he was overly influenced by the Capetian court in Paris, and about the process as a whole. He barred Langton from entering England and seized the lands of the archbishopric and other papal possessions. Innocent set a commission in place to try to convince John to change his mind, but to no avail. Innocent then placed an interdict on England in March 1208, prohibiting clergy from conducting religious services, with the exception of baptisms for the young, and confessions and absolutions for the dying.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Dense Discovery is a weekly newsletter with apptool recommendations, interesting opinion articles, design inspiration and more. It's sort of like a more high-brow version of TLDR.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: finishes cutting the claws and pets the cat.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The Internet Archive created the National Emergency Library in March as a response to the shutdown of public libraries due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It suspended book waitlists until the end of June, essentially allowing a single copy of a book to be downloaded an infinite number of times. This caused book publishers to file a lawsuit against the Internet Archive, accusing the service of violating the Copyright Act and facilitating digital piracy. The Internet Archive responded by closing the National Emergency Library early but the lawsuit might result in the shutdown of the service. Previous attempts at backing up the library have been unsuccessful, and now open-Internet activists are trying to figure out the best way to save the archive.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It was a typical Saturday afternoon, and the sun was shining brightly over the small town of Ridgeville. The streets were bustling with people going about their daily chores. In one of the houses on the outskirts of town, a young woman named Sarah was busy cleaning up her house. She had just finished dusting the living room and was now making her way to the kitchen. As she walked past the front door, she noticed a foul smell wafting in from outside. Her nose scrunched up in disgust as she realized that it was coming from the trash cans outside. She had completely forgotten to take them out the night before, and now the smell was unbearable. After taking a deep breath, Sarah made her way outside to the trash cans. She gagged as she lifted up one of the lids and peered inside. The trash was overflowing, and it was clear that the garbage had been sitting there for a few days. She knew that she had to do something about it before it attracted more pests. Without further ado, Sarah quickly went back inside to put on some gloves and grab a few trash bags. She also grabbed a broom to sweep up any mess that might have spilled on the ground. She was determined to get rid of the trash and the foul smell that came with it. It took her a while to sort through the garbage and bag it all up, but finally, the job was done. She tied up the bags tightly and carried them outside to the curb, waiting for the garbage truck to come and take them away. Sarah breathed a sigh of relief, knowing that she had done her part in keeping her environment clean. As she went back inside to continue with her cleaning, Sarah couldn't help but think about how important it is to take care of our surroundings. Simple tasks like taking out the trash might seem insignificant, but they play a huge role in keeping our homes and cities clean and free of pests. She vowed to be more diligent in taking out her trash and never again let it pile up like that.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Tim loved eggnog. He decided to buy ten bottles during the holiday season. He drank eggnog everyday. He soon got sick of it. He never liked eggnog again.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Sara only liked Sahlen's brand hot dogs. But one day she was attending a barbeque and there were none! Instead, the hosts used a cheaper brand, which Sara shied away from. Finally her hunger drove her to sample the off-brand hot dogs. To her surprise, they were very tasty!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Rude staff and tiny theaters. I wasn't happy with my service if the theater wasn't so tiny I wouldn't of had to pay 20 extra dollars per person to get into the show that I had Already purchased. The only reason why I have given this place two stars instead of one is because I went and saw the zombie burlesque which is hands-down one of the funniest shows I've seen in a long time. Did I mention the v theater staff sucks?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [title] Tuck the sheet edges under the mattress. [step] If you move around too much to hold the sheet down yourself, or if your partner is much stronger than you, try tucking both sides under the mattress.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: While I believe this is primarily an American viewpoint due to the US media's tendency to demonize the \"communist\" country, it quite often extends to Australians (mining and immigration) to Chinese (copyright infringement) and other nations. It is this almost racist mindset that leads many people to only see the \"evil\" side of China. But then again, it is also the \"evil\" side of China that seems to have captured the imaginations of many science fiction writers. Perhaps it is because they are a much more likely to be adversaries in the near future than an Islamic country would be. It is that same xenophobia that creates the image of China as a faceless, soulless mass of people. Now don't get me wrong, I am in no way a communist sympathizer, I am a socialist, a capitalist and a communist (in that order). I am, however, very interested in Chinese culture and history (hence the name of my blog) and have read a lot of books and articles on the subject. The reason I am writing this is that today I heard a news story about Chinese internet censorship and the wording was interesting. The reporter said something along the lines of \"all sites that criticize the Chinese government are banned, only sites that promote the party line are allowed.\" This is a blatant generalization that has no basis in fact. There are many sites that are highly critical of the Chinese government that are not blocked. Most of these are western based and are unlikely to be read by many Chinese people (unlike some of the Chinese sites that do get blocked) but they are there nonetheless. I do not believe that the reporter was deliberately misleading (although it is possible) but rather that they simply had a strong preconceived idea of what China was like and based their information on that rather than reality. Similarly, I once saw a news story on the same channel that criticized the Chinese government for not taking steps to prevent HIVAIDS. Although I agree that they should have taken more steps than they did (and are taking now), the story ignored the fact that they were the first government in Asia to acknowledge the disease and publicly promote its prevention. It is my belief that this ignorance of Chinese history and culture is what leads so many people to see China as a \"nation of the devil.\" They believe the propaganda from the US media that has been used to justify some of the most extreme policies of recent history, such as the Vietnam War and the Space Race. It is my hope that this will change, but I am not very optimistic. The US is very unlikely to ever be friendly with China in the near future, and thus the media will continue to spread its propaganda. On the other hand, the recent protests in Tibet and Xinjiang, as well as the earthquake in Sichuan have changed many people's views on China. Labels: Asia, China, Chinese, internet, media, news, opinion, politics, propaganda, science fiction, US",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The Xbox Live Marketplace is a virtual market designed for the console that allows Xbox Live users to download purchased or promotional content. The service offers movie and game trailers, game demos, Xbox Live Arcade games and Xbox 360 Dashboard themes as well as add-on game content (items, costumes, levels etc.). These features are available to both Free and Gold members on Xbox Live. A hard drive or memory unit is required to store products purchased from Xbox Live Marketplace. In order to download priced content, users are required to purchase Microsoft Points for use as scrip; though some products (such as trailers and demos) are free to download. Microsoft Points can be obtained through prepaid cards in 1,600 and 4,000-point denominations. Microsoft Points can also be purchased through Xbox Live with a credit card in 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 5,000-point denominations. Users are able to view items available to download on the service through a PC via the Xbox Live Marketplace website. An estimated seventy percent of Xbox Live users have downloaded items from the Marketplace.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Take a gas made out of molecules, put it in some kind of container of variable volume (like a piston cylinder, for example) and squeeze. The gas compresses just fine, but the pressure on the walls of the vessel increases the more you squeeze. Eventually you're get to the point where you just can't squeeze any harder. You can put a fully loaded Boeing 747 on top of the piston and it just won't go down any farther, because the pressure of the compressed gas is greater than the weight of the jet. But imagine you could squeeze arbitrarily hard. Like, by magic or something. And along the way, you could measure how much pressure was being exerted upwards on the piston, resisting your squeezing. What would you observe? Well, you'd notice that for a while, the pressure on the piston and cylinder would rise pretty steadily. But then you'd get to a point where it just shoots up really suddenly. In order to do a little more squeezing, you have to apply a lot more force. Why is this? Because you've squeezed the gas to the point where the electrons in the atoms are directly repelling each other due to electrostatic force. In ordinary gases, like at sea-level pressure, there's a lot of room (relatively speaking) between molecules. The molecules resist each other in much the same way the north poles of two magnets do - not quite the same, but very similar. But because there's all this empty space, there's plenty of room for the molecules to just slip past each other. So you can squeeze. But eventually you get to the point where you've squeezed out most of the empty space. The molecules can't slip past each other any more; whichever way they try to go, there are more molecules there, pushing them away like the north poles of two magnets. But just like you can push too magnets together if you push hard enough, say you keep squeezing - because we imagined that you can squeeze arbitrarily hard, remember. It's a lot harder to squeeze now, because those molecules don't want to be close to each other, just like the magnets don't, but you don't care what the molecules want. You squeeze and squeeze. The pressure on the walls of the cylinder now is called electrostatic pressure. The electrostatic force between the molecules is resisting your squeezing. And eventually, the piston just stops moving. You can squeeze a lot harder, but nothing happens. Whereas before, the pressure was just climbing steeply but steadily, now it's like you hit a wall. Why? Because you've squeezed out all the empty space. It's like you're pushing two magnets together so hard they're actually touching. Why doesn't the gas compress any further? For the same reason the magnets don't: The molecules are, in a very metaphorical but also very real sense, physically touching. See, molecules are made up of atoms, and atoms are made up of particles called fermions. Electrons and nucleons are fermions, and fermions are defined by the fact that two can't occupy the same place at the same time. Just like those magnets we've been imagining. You can't squeeze two molecules together any harder than a certain amount, because they physically bump up against each other, and there's nowhere for them to go. This kind of pressure we're talking about now - the pressure that's left when you've squeezed out all the empty space and all that's left is the fact that two electrons can't be in the same place at the same time - is called electron degeneracy pressure. But here's the thing ... we aren't actually done. Because while it's true that electrons can't occupy the same place at the same time, there's still a lot of empty space in this cylinder. It's the space between the atomic nuclei themselves. The electrons form \"shells,\" sort of, around the nucleus of an atom, the way an eggshell surrounds the yolk of an egg. If you squeeze hard enough, hard enough to overcome electrostatic pressure and electron degeneracy pressure ... you can break the shells, in a sense. What happens here is very complicated, but here's the short, simplified version. Atoms are made of protons and electrons, and also possibly neutrons but we don't care about that. When there's enough energy available - in this case, provided by your squeezing - it's possible for a proton in an atomic nucleus to spontaneously emit a particle called a W boson. When this happens, one of the quarks - the constituents of protons - changes flavor - a type of property of quarks - and the proton becomes an electron. The W boson, meanwhile, hooks up with the first electron it can find and turns that electron into an electron neutrino, which skitters off into space never to be seen again. In this way, it's possible for atoms to \"absorb\" (sort of) their electrons, converting each proton in the atomic nucleus into a neutron. Squeeze electron-degenerate matter hard enough - and I'm talking stupidly, ridiculously hard here, so hard you need an exploding star to exert this kind of pressure - and electron shells start \"collapsing\" (kind of) into their nuclei, turning electrons and protons into neutrons, leaving you with just neutrons, bound together by the strong nuclear force. So imagine you're leaning on your piston really hard, so hard you're being resisted by electron degeneracy pressure. You push harder and nothing happens. You push harder and nothing happens. Then you push harder and all of a sudden there's this huge burst of trillions of neutrinos - which you don't even notice because neutrinos go right through your body harmlessly; neutrinos don't care - and a whump and all of a sudden the piston drops like six inches. The electron-degenerate matter inside your cylinder has been replaced by neutron-degenerate matter. And the thing that's pushing up against your piston now isn't electron-degeneracy pressure, but neutron-degeneracy pressure. What happens after that? Nobody knows for sure. It's presumed that there's another type of degeneracy pressure past neutron-degeneracy pressure, where the neutrons themselves break down and are replaced by a quark gas, but nobody's yet figured out the details of how that could possibly work. The forces keeping electrons from occupying the same place are peanuts compared to the forces keeping quarks confined, so it's really kind of a mystery in abstract theoretical physics. I mean, it's known that if you squeeze hard enough you'll eventually end up with a black hole, but what happens (if anything) between neutron-degenerate matter and a black hole appearing is anybody's guess. So to put it really simply, you can think of it as a series of structural breakdowns of matter. As more external force is applied - such as by gravitation, in a collapsing star - the various things that give matter structure are overcome in a sort of punctuated sequence of collapses. Each of those collapses is resisted by a type of degeneracy pressure ... and if you want more details, you're gonna have to do the quantum mechanical stuff on your own, because I suck at math.','Inside a star there is lots of stuff going on, there is gravity pulling the entire weight of the star into the center, and it wants to pull everything into a very dense spot right at the center. There is also very powerful reactions (read explosions) happening inside the star as the atoms that make up the star are pulled together by the before mentioned gravity. Each of these explosions flings large portions of the stars weight away from the center, where it is grabbed by the gravity of the star again and pulled back in to the center to do it all over again. This is happening billions of times a second inside the star, so it creates a kind of \"standing wave\" at the edge of what we would call the star, where the pressure from the explosions is matched by the pull of the gravity and that is why we have a \"surface\" to a star. Hope that helps.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I don't know the exact route to Grand Cayman, but aircraft from the US can and do fly over Cuba. So do some private aircraft. Cuba manages their own airspace, and by international agreement must provide for a legal method of accessing that airspace by civilian aircraft. They DO NOT have to accommodate military aircraft. Cuban air traffic controllers are some of the friendliest and helpful that I have spoken with, and they do speak English, the international language of air traffic control.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Van Gaal, 65, has been out of work since being sacked by United hours after winning the FA Cup in May 2016. \"I thought maybe I would stop, then I thought it would be a sabbatical, but now I am fully in it again,\" Van Gaal told Dutch TV show VTBL. Van Gaal, who managed Ajax, Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Manchester United, says he has been approached by an unnamed club. \"I have said yes to a club but I can not announce it yet. It's not a big club but a club with a lot of potential,\" Van Gaal told Dutch broadcaster NOS. Van Gaal won the Dutch league title on three occasions at Ajax, twice at AZ Alkmaar and once at Barcelona in addition to winning league titles in Germany and England. The Dutchman then went on to manage Bayern Munich, winning the Bundesliga in 2010 before a move to Manchester United in 2014. Jose Mourinho was appointed by United in May 2016 and guided the club to a sixth-placed finish last season, meaning they failed to qualify for the Champions League. \"My wife Truus gave her consent for me to be a coach again,\" he added. Van Gaal revealed that he was frustrated that the Old Trafford board did not offer him a new contract and hinted that the deal was done behind his back. \"Within two minutes I had a club, but I have to wait,\" he said. \"That is what I wanted.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: ride two camels as a man holds the reins. and the sun-streaked sky over the desert. to the ends of the earth, that is, to the United States. and am cheered by my friends. There's something to be said for new beginnings. a new beginning as I enter a new place in life. are made to be improved. if you're still willing to try. and enriched by the experience. has been a strange and wonderful gift. to embrace another part of life's journey. as I move forward in life. This entry was posted in Adventure, Life and tagged adventure, Life, new beginnings by kathymfindley. Bookmark the permalink.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Gadz, now there's THIS place! I went over here last time (before today) to have my teeth cleaned by a student at a reduced rate, since I don't have dental insurance. The cost was 35 plus 9 for the fluoride treatment that they pushed on me, for a total of 44. This represents about a 21 savings over the cost at a regular dentist. Passable so far. Well, it was 26 miles each way from my house, but hey, I'm saving a little money. The trouble was, girl took TWENTY X-Rays on my first appointment, taking most of 2 hours, that's all she did!:-O I made another appointment to go back for the scaling polishing, drove over there again. This time, girl took most of two hours to clean my TOP TEETH ONLY, that was it!:-O On my THIRD visit, she took most of two hours, cleaned my bottom teeth. Ok, so here's where it all ended up: NINE hours spent, including driving time! 156 miles driven! No, no, no! Even if you live closer, SIX HOURS in the chair to have your teeth cleaned is not ok! I recommend that everyone avoid this place at all costs!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Jane has always wanted to cut her hair in a bob. Her friends and family tell her that bob haircuts are out of style. However, Jane decide to get her hair cut anyway. She loves the way she looks in her new bob haircut. Jenny feels very happy with the way she looks now.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The 30-year-old joined Cobblers on a one-year deal last summer, making 25 appearances in all competitions. But boss Justin Edinburgh said the club were unable to \"get comfortable\" with his commitments to DR Congo. \"Gaby is a top professional, we wish him all the very best for his future career,\" said Edinburgh.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Future Crunch is a once every other week newsletter full of optimistic news and breakthroughs in science and technology. I highly recommend you sign up for it.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: BREAKING NEWS: Amazon Acquires Facebook's Satellite Team to Bolster Starlink Competitor In a significant move to enhance its space-based communication network, Amazon has purchased Facebook's team responsible for developing satellites. The acquisition provides a significant boost to Amazon's Starlink competitor, indicating the tech giant's ambitions to become a major player in satellite internet services. The deal highlights the growing competition between Amazon and its rivals, including SpaceX, for setting up an extensive satellite network to provide high-speed internet access to remote and under-served areas worldwide. By building its own constellation of satellites, Amazon aims to improve its cloud computing and offer internet services to places without a proper terrestrial network. The addition of Facebook's satellite team, widely recognized as one of the most talented in the industry, will accelerate Amazon's development of its Starlink-like constellation, posing a significant challenge to SpaceX. The exact terms of the deal have not been disclosed, but it's believed that Amazon has paid a hefty sum for the talent that the Facebook satellite team brings to the table. Stay tuned for updates on this new development in the space industry.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This is my last day. Summer is coming, I can feel it. The temperature is rising up, my whole body is sweating. Minutes by minutes, hours by hours, I am getting smaller. The heat is scratching my body. My end is getting closer. It is fun, when you are surrounded by kids, playing beside you. They pat my back gently. Sometimes, they are circling around my body, laughing. It is the best thing for me, to see at their smile, it is priceless. However my time has come. I will be back later, for sure. So please play with me again, promise me that you will wait me.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Von Neumann founded the field of game theory as a mathematical discipline. Von Neumann proved his minimax theorem in 1928. This theorem establishes that in zero-sum games with perfect information (i.e. in which players know at each time all moves that have taken place so far), there exists a pair of strategies for both players that allows each to minimize his maximum losses, hence the name minimax. When examining every possible strategy, a player must consider all the possible responses of his adversary. The player then plays out the strategy that will result in the minimization of his maximum loss.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Frequency Therapeutics is seeking to reverse hearing loss by regrowing hair cells in the inner ear. It has developed a drug candidate that can be injected into the ear to stimulate new growth, and it's testing this treatment for patients with sensorineural hearing loss due to otosclerosis (a disease of the middle ear). Frequency also plans on developing treatments targeting other forms of hearing loss caused by genetic mutations or diseases such as Meniere's syndrome and deafness following cochlear implantation surgery. The key risk factor for Frequency is its reliance on cash from investors and debt financing options rather than generating revenue through sales of its products. In December 2019, Frequency announced an at-the-market equity offering program under which it could sell up to 50 million worth of common stock over time. With no approved product candidates yet in hand, if frequency isn't able to raise capital when needed especially during trials where expenses are high there would likely have to be significant cuts made across the company's operations until more funding becomes available. That said, management seems confident enough about raising funds coming down the pipeline that they've included a line item of anticipated future fundraising activities totaling approximately 450 million throughout their corporate presentation materials filed with regulators last month.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Many IOT devices require you to use proprietary apps that can't be audited for security. Sometimes, the only way to ensure privacy on a device is to hack it. This talk will provide a high level overview of what's involved in reverse engineering IOT devices, including the hardware, firmware, software and protocols. It will show you how to start tearing down your own IOT devices and what you should be looking for. Jonathan Reiber is Chief Strategy Officer at the cybersecurity firm, Bayshore Networks, Inc., and former Chief of Cybersecurity for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). He was responsible for overseeing the DHS cybersecurity mission, ensuring that the nation's cybersecurity... Read More Hacking, Intermediate",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Prior to the Golden Age of Mandolins, France had a history with the mandolin, with mandolinists playing in Paris until the Napoleonic Wars. The players, teachers and composers included Giovanni Fouchetti, Eduardo Mezzacapo, Gabriele Leon, and Gervasio. During the Golden age itself (1880s-1920s), the mandolin had a strong presence in France. Prominent mandolin players or composers included Jules Cottin and his sister Madeleine Cottin, Jean Pietrapertosa, and Edgar Bara. Paris had dozens of \"estudiantina\" mandolin orchestras in the early 1900s. Mandolin magazines included L'Estudiantina, Le Plectre, Ecole de la mandolie.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Media playback is not supported on this device At 44 years old, Owens was the oldest of the 12 referees chosen for the World Cup, but his age will not prevent him from realising a dream. The 1000-run mark came up when KL Rahul got to 19 and that was the second time in the day that Rahul had brought up a milestone. Rahul and Vijay added 18 runs to the overnight score when Amir, who bowled a no ball on the previous delivery, had Vijay caught behind. Vijay has been dismissed 10 times by left-arm pace bowlers, including five by Mohammad Amir. But India's 100-mark came up in the 30th over and the match was evenly poised. Earlier, India's bowlers did well to restrict Pakistan to 3385 in their 50 overs. After Hardik Pandya was dismissed in the 40th over, Jadhav, who had walked in to bat with the score at 92 for 4, stayed in the middle till the end. For India, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Shami and Hardik Pandya took one wicket each. \"I thought there was an outside edge,\" Kohli said after the match. \"We played really well. We can't be more happy with the kind of cricket that we played in the last two weeks.\" Pakistan had shocked England to enter their maiden final of the tournament while defending champions India defeated Bangladesh to set up the title clash. \"The turnaround has been magnificent.\" India have won all three of their previous matches against Pakistan in the knockout stages of ICC tournaments to date, including in the semi-finals of the 2011 World Cup on home soil in Mohali. \"If you look at the players we selected, nobody expected us to go to the final, let alone win the tournament.\" The roar got louder when he brought up his half-century. \"You got to give credit to the opposition as well, they were outstanding.\" \"I've never played in a game like this.\" \"They've got some fantastic players.\" \"It's been an up and down ride for us but I'm just so proud of the boys, they've been unbelievable,\" Morgan said. During this period, Pakistan scored just 72 runs. Earlier, India lost three wickets for 54 runs in the first 10 overs. The 18th over of the innings bowled by Hardik Pandya was a turning point in the match as Pakistan took 19 runs from it to revive their innings. \"We knew they would come hard.\" \"The turnaround has been magnificent,\" said Kohli. A soft dismissal for the Proteas' skipper, who was trapped in front of the stumps as he attempted a sweep shot off the bowling of leg-spinner Imran Tahir. \"I think we've got the ability to play long games as well.\" On the way to his half century, Fakhar Zaman brought up the 100 for Pakistan with a massive six. \"The attitude and the style of play that the boys have shown was outstanding, and today was a complete performance,\" he said. But Pakistan, the lowest-ranked side to feature in a Champions Trophy final and appearing in their first ICC final since the 2009 World Twenty20, bounced back to dismiss India's top three in quick succession. The race started on Thursday with two loop circuits and a sprint around a lake. \"This is the first day and we've got three more.\" The 42-year-old Roulston, who retired from cycling after competing at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, is now a Cannondale-Drapac team director. The campaign period will be shortened by a month, from 90 days to two months, and candidates can only spend up to S3.50 per voter. The new law also provides for a year-long ban from the civil service for any public officer charged with corruption.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: They forgot my order, I waited 25 minutes for my bubble tea. The worst attitude I have ever experienced. I've had a few good experiences with Chinese Tea House - try the peach milk tea!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Object detection has been vigorously investigated for years but fast accurate detection for real-world scenes remains a very challenging problem. Overcoming drawbacks of single-stage detectors, we take aim at precisely, quickly detecting objects through a two-stage detection framework, which first extracts proposals and then classifies them. Our key contribution lies in proposing a novel cascaded convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, which consists of a number of CNNs built on top of each other and improves the performance of each stage. For the first stage, we propose a novel fully convolutional network (FCN) called Region Proposal Network (RPN) to generate object proposals. The RPN shares full-image convolutional features with the second stage. It can be trained very efficiently by sampling image patches and their corresponding objectness scores, and be easily deployed on mobile devices. For the second stage, we devise a multitask loss to jointly train for classification, bounding-box regression and objectness score prediction. Experimental results on the PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset show that our method can achieve competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on both detection speed and accuracy. In this paper, we present a novel object detection method, termed Faster R-CNN, that uses a region proposal network (RPN) to extract region proposals and a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify these proposals using their deep features. Our main contributions are twofold. (1) Our RPN is a fully convolutional network that shares full-image convolutional features with the detection network, and can therefore be trained very efficiently. (2) Our detection network is a single-stage fully convolutional network that jointly performs object detection and bounding-box regression in a single pass, thus achieving high speed without sacrificing detection accuracy. Our experiments show that our method achieves significant speedups over prior methods with comparable accuracy on the PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset. We propose a fast region-based convolutional network (Faster R-CNN) for object detection. Unlike previous region-based detection methods that run a separate detection network for each region, Faster R-CNN shares a single detection network across all image regions. By doing so, Faster R-CNN has a single-stage architecture that runs at 5 fps, much faster than previous multi-stage methods. Our approach is based on the observation that the fully convolutional network in a region-based detector can be trained to output class scores for objectness and bounding box offsets jointly, rather than being trained separately for classification and localization. To achieve this, we devise a simple yet effective method to train the shared detection network using online hard negative mining, where we automatically select negative proposals and assign them larger loss weights. We evaluate Faster R-CNN on the PASCAL VOC 2007 and MS COCO 2014 datasets. On the VOC 2007 test set, Faster R-CNN obtains 11.2 mAP improvement over the previous best published result, and achieves 36.8 mAP at 0.5 false positive per image. On the challenging MS COCO 2014 test set, Faster R-CNN obtains 3.4 mAP improvement over the previous best published result, and achieves 29.6 mAP at 0.5 false positive per image. In addition, the code is implemented with Caffe and is publicly available for download at We present an object detection method based on deep neural networks. We name the proposed method Faster R-CNN because it shares some similarities with the R-CNN method proposed by Girshick et al., but our method is much faster than the original R-CNN, thanks to a new feature extraction and evaluation method. In our method, region proposals are extracted using selective search. A deep neural network based on the VGG network is applied to each region proposal to extract deep features. A set of bounding box regressors and a set of binary classifiers are trained to jointly predict the class label and the bounding box offsets of the input region proposal. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the challenging PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset, with a mean average precision (mAP) of 51.2 at 0.5 false positives (FPs) per image. The method is very fast and achieves 45.6 FPS on a GPU. We",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [step] The warmth from your hands will create a thinner consistency and help make it easier to spread on your nails. Never shake the bottle, as this will create tiny bubbles.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We consider the synthesis of distributed implementations for specifications in parameterized temporal logics such as PROMPT - LTL , which extends LTL by temporal operators equipped with parameters that bound their scope. For single process synthesis, it is well-established that such parametric extensions do not increase worst-case complexities. For synchronous distributed systems, we show that, despite being more powerful, the realizability problem for PROMPT - LTL is not harder than its LTL counterpart. For asynchronous systems, we have to express scheduling assumptions and therefore consider an assume-guarantee synthesis problem. As asynchronous distributed synthesis is already undecidable for LTL , we give a semi-decision procedure for the PROMPT - LTL assume-guarantee synthesis problem based on bounded synthesis. Finally, we show that our results extend to the stronger logics PLTL and PLDL .",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: A lot better than Panda Express. Ordered the regular size dark meat chicken rice bowl and it was so good. I love the teriyaki suace and made sure to ask for extra! The regular size is a perfect portion to fill you up and they aren't skimpy on food. It's nice to find a clean, fast, and delicious teriyaki joint. We will be back.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We present the contribution of the Unbabel team to the WMT 2019 Shared Task on Quality Estimation. We participated on the word, sentence, and document-level tracks, encompassing 3 language pairs: English-Spanish, English-French, and English-German. We also presented our results at the Workshop on Information Retrieval and Automated Text Analysis (IIRA), where we shared the top-1 score on the English-German dataset. In this paper, we discuss our approach to the task, our training and evaluation setup, and our results. Our code is available at Introduction Quality Estimation is a crucial step in the creation of machine translation systems. Human translators, who often possess expertise in a particular domain, can quickly identify poor translations that require further manual editing and clarification [Wang2017Human; Yu2018ACM]. On the other hand, computational systems are often unable to adequately address these needs [Koehn2018], which can lead to poor-quality machine translations that are difficult to correct. As such, systems that can automatically evaluate the quality of machine translations have the potential to reduce the need for human intervention, improve the quality of the translations produced, and even reduce the cost of producing machine translations. While many papers have focused on the use of machine learning techniques for quality estimation [Chen2016Evaluating; Koehn2017], the majority of these works focus on predicting whether a sentence or document is of high or low quality. Such approaches do not provide an overall score for a machine translation, which can be difficult to interpret for the human translator. To address this, we aim to produce an overall score that provides the user with an indication of the quality of the machine translation in both a word and sentence level. We introduce a novel approach to this problem based on a combination of word embeddings and contextual word embeddings, and evaluate it on the WMT 2019 Shared Task on Quality Estimation. Word Embeddings Word embeddings have become a popular technique in machine learning. They represent words as low-dimensional vectors in a vector space, where the distance between words indicates their semantic similarity [Mikolov2013]. One popular approach to word embeddings is to train a language model on a large corpus of text [Mikolov2013; Le2014; Collobert2011]. By training a language model, the model learns to predict the next word in a sentence given the current word, which allows for the representation of a word as a vector in the same space as its surrounding words. Contextual Word Embeddings Contextual word embeddings have been used in the past to improve performance on a variety of tasks, including word sense disambiguation [Ribeiro2017], question answering [Faruqui2018], and sentiment analysis [Goyal2017]. One popular approach to contextual word embeddings is to use a bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) [Graves2005] to encode the context of a word, where the context vector is used as a vector in the same space as the word vector. We propose a novel approach to contextual word embeddings that combines the outputs of a BiLSTM with word embeddings to create a new representation of a word. Word Embeddings and Contextual Word Embeddings for Quality Estimation {sec:approach} Word Embeddings We use pre-trained word embeddings, and train them on the Gigaword corpus [McInerney2010]. The word embeddings are trained using the skip-gram objective [Mikolov2013], and the learning rate is set to 103}. We use a hidden layer size of 100 and a vocabulary size of 100,000. We use the word embeddings in a word-based contextual word embedding model. Contextual Word Embeddings We train a BiLSTM to encode the context of a word. For this task, we use the gated version of the BiLSTM [Graves2005], which is composed of an input gate and a forget gate. The input gate controls the information that is passed into the LSTM cell, while the forget gate controls how much of the information is forgotten. The input gate is a binary variable that controls the information that is passed into the LSTM cell, while the forget gate is a binary variable that controls how much of the information is forgotten. These two gates are combined into a single scalar value, it, which is used to determine how much of the input to the LSTM cell should be used.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Davis had always wanted to snowboard in Utah. He had been told that the mountains there had beautiful snow. He and a friend took the long drive to Utah to snowboard. The mountains were beautiful. The snow was beautiful. Snowboarding was beautiful. The trip was a success. On the way back to Texas, Davis was a passenger in the car. His friend was driving. They were traveling on the highway. They had been driving for awhile. His friend looked at Davis and said, \"I'm getting tired. Do you want to drive?\" Davis didn't say anything. He was tired too. His friend knew he was tired. He was driving anyway. Davis began to think about what his friend had said. He was in fact tired. He was getting sleepy. He looked out the window and saw a sign that read, \"Next Rest Area: 30 Miles.\" His friend was driving and he was getting sleepy. If he was getting sleepy, then his friend was getting sleepy. Davis had to make a choice. He had to choose between two options: 1) say nothing and let his friend drive, or 2) say something and drive himself. Which option did he choose? Davis was getting sleepy. His friend was getting sleepy. His friend was driving. He was a passenger. He had to choose between two options: 1) say nothing and let his friend drive, or 2) say something and drive himself. He made the choice to drive. He made the choice to drive because he believed that it was the right thing to do. He believed that it was the right thing to do because it was safer. It was safer because if he drove, then he would be more alert. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be more alert because he would be driving. He would be",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Roy had a very dirty bathroom. So he bought some industrial grade cleaners to clean it. His mother warned him about the dangers of such chemicals. He used the chemicals and then he went to bed. The next morning, Roy woke up and noticed the horrible smell of his bathroom. He thought he should get out of bed and investigate. He then started coughing up blood and died. He was only 12. It is a very real and tragic story of a young boy from Oregon who died from chemical poisoning. Roy's mother told the story to NBC news in order to warn other parents and children of the dangers of industrial cleaners. Roy was an average 12-year-old. He loved to do what most kids do: play sports, have fun and do a bit of cleaning. Roy's mother, Kari, has always warned her son about the dangers of chemicals. She worked with them as a chemical engineer. She would always caution Roy about the dangers of these chemicals. Roy had a bit of a messy habit. He would be a little messy and careless with his clothes. One day, he left his clothes in the bathroom. The next day, Kari asked Roy to clean his clothes. Roy then proceeded to buy a number of industrial grade cleaning products. He used the chemicals to clean his bathroom. The next day, he woke up to the smell of a dirty bathroom. Roy went to investigate. He noticed that his bathroom was still dirty. He then started coughing up blood. He was rushed to the hospital. The doctors did all they could but it was too late. Roy died from a chemical poisoning. He inhaled a mixture of chemicals. The combination of chemicals caused him to have acute respiratory failure. His lungs had too much damage. Roy's family is still grieving over the loss. They have to live with the fact that they will never see Roy again. They also have to live with the knowledge that his death could have been prevented. Roy's mother wants to share her story in order to warn other parents. Kids need to be warned about the dangers of chemicals. She wants to warn other children about the dangers of industrial grade cleaning products. She also wants to warn parents about the dangers of these cleaning products. They are not made for children. The instructions are not made for children. The warnings on the bottles are not made for children. Parents also need to teach their kids about the dangers of mixing chemicals. It is very dangerous to mix chemicals. The mixture can cause serious health problems. The mixture can even be deadly.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Feature extraction from financial data is one of the most important problems in market prediction domain for which many approaches have been suggested. Among other modern tools, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown impressive performance in feature extraction from financial data. CNNs apply convolutions to time series data, identifying patterns and trends that can be used for market prediction. In financial time series data, CNNs have been shown to outperform traditional time series forecasting techniques like ARIMA and LSTM models. Additionally, feature extraction techniques like wavelet transforms and Fourier transforms can also be used in tandem with CNNs to extract the most relevant features from financial data.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Bob was cooking sausages on the stove top. He tried to flip the sausages over with a spatula. The sausages fell all over the ground. His dog quickly ate a few of them. He had to cook a few more. It took him an extra 10 minutes.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Everyday in school was the same, crisp monotone. Wake up, arrive, work, break, work, dinner, work, depart, homework, chill out, sleep. I was neither happy nor sad, especially. Some days were nice, some days were bad, and some days were boring. Some days were good and some days were bad. In my mind, nothing changed. I lived in a limbo of neutral space, without any objective good or bad. The only thing that could have changed things was my schoolwork, and I could not be bothered with that. I'm not saying I wasn't going to do it. I was, but my mind was not there. It was never there. So I did nothing. Passively, I would do things, but not actively. I would wake up and think, 'I'm going to go to school', but I would not go. It was a passive-aggressive kind of thing. I knew that if I went to school I would do nothing, but if I didn't go I would have to do something. So I would do nothing. But I was never actually in school. I was just floating around in that space. If I were to define that space, I would say it was the middle of nowhere. It was nowhere. It was a kind of vacuity. I was not a kid. I was not a teenager. I was a big adult. I did not know what to do. I didn't know what I wanted. I didn't know what I was. I didn't know who I was. I was a shell. My mind was a shell, a dead shell. I was nothing. I was an empty shell. My mind was empty. I had nothing in there. My mind was a dead space. I didn't even have an idea of what I was thinking. I was not even thinking. I was not even thinking at all. I was nothing. I was just this empty space. I didn't even have a physical presence. I didn't have a body. I was not there. I was a nothing. I was just a hollow space. I didn't even have a mental presence. I didn't have any thoughts. I was just an empty space. I was nothing. My mind was an empty space. I was nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing. I was a nothing.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: YC Startup Felix Wants to Replace Antibiotics with Programmable Viruses A promising startup in the biotech industry, Felix, is currently working on a groundbreaking technology that aims to replace antibiotics with programmable viruses. The company, which was founded by a team of scientists and entrepreneurs from the University of California, Berkeley has already secured funding from some of the most prestigious venture capital firms in Silicon Valley, including Y Combinator. Felix's approach to fighting bacterial infections is based on the use of bacteriophages, or viruses that specifically target bacteria. The concept of using phages as an alternative to antibiotics is not new, but Felix's technology takes it to the next level. The startup has developed a platform that allows scientists to program phages to target specific strains of bacteria, much like software engineers program computers. According to founders Robert McBride and Colton Lloyd, the goal of Felix is to create a library of programmable phages that can be used to tackle the most common bacterial infections, such as E. coli, staphylococcus aureus, and salmonella. McBride and Lloyd believe that the use of phages could be a more effective and safer alternative to antibiotics, which are becoming increasingly ineffective due to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. \"Antibiotics are like a blunt instrument - they kill all bacteria in their path, both good and bad,\" said McBride, who holds a PhD in microbiology. \"Phages, on the other hand, are like a scalpel - they only kill the specific strain of bacteria they've been programmed to attack.\" Felix's technology has already been tested in the lab on a variety of bacterial strains and has shown promising results. The startup is now seeking partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and hospitals to further develop and commercialize its platform. The use of phages as a therapeutic approach is not new - they have been used in Eastern Europe and Russia for decades - but the technology has struggled to gain traction in the Western world. However, with the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, more and more researchers are turning to phages as a potential solution. If successful, Felix's technology could revolutionize the way we treat bacterial infections and save countless lives in the process.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Okay, gay marriage is quite 'hot' right now, and I found out that a lot of you guys don't think it should be legalized (I searched on CMV reddit) I think it should be legalized, and here's why: - The arguments people use against gay marriage are quite easy to disprove. - You make a lot of people unhappy with it, when they can't marry - When gay people are married, it doesn't mean you have to marry someone of your own gender! really, what's all the fuss about? you don't die or something... - It is quite a subject about what you believe. Most Christians and Islamic persons are against it. But the world is not ruled by believe anymore! EDIT: Thank you all for your comments! Wow, maybe i tought to easy about gay marriage... I still think it should be llegalised, but that is is not so easy to fix as it looks like! thank you all for explaining!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Yet another boom began as the city emerged from the Great Recession. Amazon.com moved its headquarters from North Beacon Hill to South Lake Union and began a rapid expansion. For the five years beginning in 2010, Seattle gained an average of 14,511 residents per year, with the growth strongly skewed toward the center of the city, as unemployment dropped from roughly 9 percent to 3.6 percent. The city has found itself \"bursting at the seams,\" with over 45,000 households spending more than half their income on housing and at least 2,800 people homeless, and with the country's sixth-worst rush hour traffic.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Apple's custom-designed M2 chips entered production this month. The chips will be introduced with new Macs in the second half of 2021. They are being manufactured by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Thank you for sharing this information. It is indeed exciting news for Apple and its customers. Apple's move towards custom-designed chips will likely result in improved performance, power efficiency, and better integration with their software and hardware. We look forward to seeing the new Macs that will feature the M2 chips later this year.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: hue.tools is a toolbox for working with colors. It features color mixing, blending, conversion, modification, detailed information, and more. hue.tools was built with TypeScript, Svelte, SvelteKit, and Tailwind. The tool can output in multiple formats, including HEX, RGB, HSL, HSV, HSI, and LAB.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I cannot fathom a way for private companies to make a profit by insuring the elderly, the poor, and the chronically ill. That's why they created the \"pre-existing condition,\" so they wouldn't have to insure the unprofitable. If an action isn't profitable, the free market won't do it. This is why I don't think the market (by itself) can provide healthcare for everyone, and why government must play some sort of role in correcting that market failure. Am I missing something? How do market enthusiasts envision oldpoorcancerous getting healthcare or health insurance? Thanks! Muzz",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We always try to stop here when saying downtown. Good food and friendly service. Love the chips and bean dip. Steak fajitas are plentifully, enchiladas are great, and the margaritas made with fresh squeezed lime juice hit you right between your eyes! more ABOUT OUR SERVICES MY ACCOUNT From family friendly trips with kid friendly activities to local plumbers lawyers, spas, and contractors. Judy's Book has millions of listings and reviews for the best and not so great. Whether you're looking for a specific business or just trying to discover great places we make it easy. We're a family oriented site focusing on bringing trusted reviews and recommendations to moms and others. Green and Sustainable places are becoming more relevant to Judy's Book users, have a favorite place? Write a review and tell users why it's Green!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This essay argues that a new form of democracy - an \"Emergent Democracy\" - will develop as a result of the use of Internet communication tools and platforms such as blogs. The essay explores a variety of tools available and explores the history of democracy, modern experiments with democracy and how these tools might support democracy. The essay also explores concerns as these new tools emerge. These issues include concerns such as privacy and the societally negative use of these tools by corporations, totalitarian regimes and terrorists.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The Social Security Trust Fund is a set of special US Treasury bonds issued to the Social Security Administration. The bonds provide a convenient accounting mechanism to keep track of the dedicated tax for Social Security, but they do not provide any extra security to the system, and are not in any way \"savings\" that the government could call on to pay Social Security benefits, or for any other purpose The fundamental reason is that the bonds are owned by the same entity who issued them. The Social Security Administration and the US Treasury are both subsidiaries of the US Government. The US Government just owes money to itself. Each year, the money to pay for Social Security benefits comes from payroll taxes, and to the extent that the SSA cashes in the bonds, the various other taxes the US government charges (income tax, tariffs, etc). Kevin Drum [wrote a piece] on this a couple years ago that lays out the case on the other side. Social Security surplus was invested in treasury bonds. What does that mean? It means that workers gave money to the federal government, which turned around and spent it. In return, the Social Security trust fund received bonds that represented promises to repay the money later out of the federal government's income tax receipts. In effect, it gave workers a claim on the income tax receipts of the government at a later date in time. When that time came, the federal government would have to pay up, which would make it less profitable. If the government was already running a deficit, it would make the deficit even worse. The workers do not have a claim on the future tax receipts of the Federal government though. Under US law, [there is no property interest in future Social Security payments.] If the US Treasury defaulted on those bonds, the only entity who could sue would be the SSA, in a case titled United States v. United States. Indeed, Congress has plenary discretion to alter or eliminate Social Security payments, andor forgive the debts owed to the SSA by the US Treasury. This makes it very much unlike other debt promises. Congress would not be able to repudiate a public bond under the 14th Amendment (or 5th Amendment). But they can revoke Social Security any time they want. So there is no property interest. It's a useful accounting fiction that lets the program keep track of the dedicated tax, but it does not represent meaningful savings or anything that Americans should consider a safeguard of their retirements, because it's just one hand owing money to the other. Edit 1: Would be curious for any replies related to what happens when the trust fund \"runs out.\" This is the area I'm most conflicted re: the realness of the fund. Hello, users of CMV! This is a footnote from your moderators. We'd just like to remind you of a couple of things. Firstly, please remember to [read through our rules] . If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. Speaking of which, [downvotes don't change views] ! If you are thinking about submitting a CMV yourself, please have a look through our [popular topics wiki] first. Any questions or concerns? Feel free to [message us] . Happy CMVing!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We present an alternative layer to convolution layers in convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Our approach reduces the complexity of convolutions by replacing it with binary decisions. Those binary decisions are used as indexes to conditional distributions where each weight represents a leaf in a decision tree. This means that only the indices to the weights need to be determined once, thus reducing the complexity of convolutions by the depth of the output tensor. Index computation is performed by simple binary decisions that require fewer cycles compared to conventionally used multiplications. In addition, we show how convolutions can be replaced by binary decisions. These binary decisions form indices in the conditional distributions and we show how they are used to replace 2D weight matrices as well as 3D weight tensors. These new layers can be trained like convolution layers in CNNs based on the backpropagation algorithm, for which we provide a formalization. Our results on multiple publicly available data sets show that our approach performs similar to conventional neuronal networks. Beyond the formalized reduction of complexity and the improved qualitative performance, we show the runtime improvement empirically compared to convolution layers.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Swift Algorithms (GitHub Repo) Makes Solving Complex Problems Easier for Developers Developers around the world are praising the recent release of Swift Algorithms, a comprehensive open-source library of algorithms written in the Swift programming language. Developed by Apple, Swift Algorithms provides a wide range of algorithms that can be used to solve complex programming problems. The release of Swift Algorithms was announced on GitHub on Monday, and it has already garnered a considerable amount of interest from developers. The GitHub repository now has over 1,000 stars and counting. The library includes algorithms for sorting, searching, and data manipulation, among others. Swift Algorithms is designed to make the programming process easier and more efficient for developers. By providing pre-written algorithms for common problems, developers can focus on writing the code that is specific to their projects. One of the key features of Swift Algorithms is its implementation of high-level algorithms. These algorithms are often used in computer science and are generally more complex than other algorithms. They are also more difficult to implement from scratch. With the pre-written algorithms in Swift Algorithms, developers can solve complex problems more easily and reduce development time. Another key feature of Swift Algorithms is its ability to be used with other Swift libraries. This means that developers can use Swift Algorithms in conjunction with other libraries to create more robust and complete projects. The release of Swift Algorithms is a significant step forward for the Swift programming language. It provides developers with a powerful and efficient tool to solve complex programming problems, and it shows that Apple is committed to making Swift a powerful language for developers. Swift Algorithms is available for free on GitHub, and developers are encouraged to check it out and give it a try. With its comprehensive library of algorithms, Swift Algorithms is sure to make the programming process easier and more efficient for developers around the world.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The third door. If I picked door one I could have eternal happiness, something I had never quite managed to gain. Door two would give me knowledge, ending my constant quest to learn everything I could. But door three was mysterious. Unmarked. Unknown. That door was the worst door to pick. I spent my whole life making contrary decisions. I didn't see why death should change that. \"I know what door you're going to choose.\" The man who I suppose was God sighed heavily. Almost sadly. I was surprised to find there was a God, having spent my life not believing in Him. I was also surprised that I even qualified for Heaven. My lifetime had not been spent praying for salvation and I had never once asked for forgiveness for any of my many, many sins. Not that I was a monster. I tried to be a good person, I didn't steal, or kill anyone. I cheerfully denied the existence of God and an afterlife and lived my own life accordingly. \"What's behind the door?\" I asked, knowing the answer. If He knew he would have told me. He shrugged. I frowned. God should not shrug, \"I don't know. No one has ever opened it.\" \"No one has ever been curious?\" He must have been lying. If God can shrug and not know something, He can lie. He shook His head, \"No. Happiness and knowledge have been enough for everyone so far.\" He held out a hand to me, \"We both know where you're going, so let's not put it off any longer. My hand sweat as I put it in his. I was absurdly bothered by it. I was dead, why would my hand be sweaty? How? My physical body and all of its sweat glands were in a morgue somewhere. By the time I decided that it must be a projection of my mind in order to male myself feel more or less like everything was ok, we were standing in front of the doors. Door One looked like the door to the bedroom of my first apartment. Punk rock posters were taped to it and it looked like a standard, cheap hollow core door. I loved that apartment. My first taste of freedom. Door Two was a clear glass double door that had books and books and books piled behind it. I could have happily been reading in there until the heat death of the universe. Door Three looked heavy. It was made of very dark stained wood worth an intricate damask pattern carved into it. It was like no other door I has ever seen before. A tiny worm of doubt crept up my spine. \"You can still pick a different option.\" God said softly, releasing my hand. I could only shake my head as I reached for the handle. This was where I was going. The long golden handle turned easily in my hand and the door opened smooth and and silently swung inward. \"Good luck.\" God waved a little as I stepped over the threshold. I fell. For what seemed like forever I fell. Down and down in pitch blankness I thought it would never end. Long after I had gotten bored of screaming and was wishing for my cell phone, I was surrounded by brilliant light and I hit the ground. Hard. So hard I swear I bounced. It took a full minute of looking around to believe where I was. I was home. I was across the parking lot from the building where I worked and I was watching myself get into my car. The very same car that was about to be carjacked by a psycho who would later dismember me and throw me in bits into a nearby quarry. But not before torturing and abusing me for a coulee of days. Before I made the conscious decision, I started running across the asphalt.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The Academy Selsey suffered extensive damage and much of its contents was destroyed in the blaze on 21 August. The school's 453 pupils are currently being taught at four locations That's unfortunate to hear. Is there anything I can do to help with this situation?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: pgsync is a command-line tool for syncing Postgres data between databases. It is 4x faster than traditional tools on a 4-core machine, has built-in methods to prevent data from leaving the server, and can sync partial tables, groups of tables, and related records.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This is something that I just have such a hard time understanding. For years we have been stuck with having cable or satellite subscriptions that are overly priced and force you to watch content you do not want. This is something that I am fighting every day to bring about change. If we can reduce the amount of people who watch content we don't want, then we can decrease the amount of money we spend on that content. What is wrong with that? I understand that people who are employed can't change the way they live, but there are so many people that are not employed that could really use the extra money. Why do we need to watch the news and sports that we don't want? Why do we need to watch the soap operas that we don't want? I mean, I'm all for keeping our kids away from violence and sex, but these programs have so much sex and violence that they should not be on television at all. The average viewer doesn't want to watch them, so why do we keep showing them? I'm not going to say that I will stop watching them, but I am going to stop watching them if they keep showing them. There are so many people that watch them because they think they are good for you, but in reality they are the opposite. It's a shame that people are so afraid of losing money that they are willing to keep watching the programs that they don't want. I understand that many people are living paycheck to paycheck and that is difficult, but I just don't understand why we can't take the time to watch programs that are good for us and watch the rest when we have the time. I'm not saying that you should quit watching all the programs that you don't want, but I am saying that you should at least watch them when you have the time. If you are unemployed, then you can't change the way you live, but there are so many people that are employed and can change the way they live if they want. I have heard so many people say that they don't have the time to watch TV, but the truth is that they do have the time. I know that there are people that are working two jobs, but if you have the time to work, then you have the time to watch TV. If you don't have the money to change the way you live, then you need to be more realistic with yourself. If you can't change the way you live, then you should at least make the effort to watch the programs that you want to watch. I know that I could watch less TV if I wanted to, but I don't. I just don't have the time, but I have the time to watch the programs that I want. I'm not saying that I will stop watching all the programs that I don't want, but I am saying that I will stop watching them when I have the time. There are so many programs that are good for us and we should be watching them. The programs that are bad for us should be watched less often, but not stopped. There are so many programs that are good for us and we should be watching them. I don't have the time to watch the programs that I don't want, but I do have the time to watch the programs that I want. CHAPTER 10 CRAFT CRAFTING For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. ROMANS 8:18 It was a beautiful day and we had decided to spend the day outside. The sun was shining and we were all enjoying the day together. My husband was taking a nap, and I was working on my craft. I was working on my cross stitch and had been working on it for the past few months. I was happy with the progress that I was making and had just started on a new cross stitch project. I was having a great time and was enjoying my time outside. The truth is that I had not had much time to work on my cross stitch because of my business, but I was happy that I had time to work on it now. My son came out of the house and saw me working on my cross stitch. He asked if he could help me with it. I was happy to let him help me, so I told him that he could. We worked together for a while and then he said that he was going to help his sister with her cross stitch project. I was happy that he wanted to help his sister with her cross stitch project, but I was a little sad that he wanted to leave. I was still working on my cross stitch project and he was still helping his sister with her cross stitch project. My husband got up and came outside and we talked for a while.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: My son had to read Frankenstein for summer reading. I called the local bookstore and reserved a copy. When I got there the clerk said someone had taken the book. I was angry at her, but she called a nearby store and reserved a copy. We got the book, finally.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We propose a compressive sensing algorithm that exploits geometric properties of images to recover images of high quality from few measurements. The image reconstruction is done by iterating the two following steps: (1) image estimation by a non-linear least-squares method that incorporates a prior knowledge of the image being reconstructed, and (2) projecting the estimated image onto the set of images that are consistent with the measurements. The second step is performed by solving a convex optimization problem. The proposed algorithm combines the benefits of both compressive sensing and geometric image priors. For this algorithm, we propose two priors: (1) the total variation prior, and (2) a new prior that encodes the assumption that images are piecewise smooth. The latter prior, in combination with our algorithm, enables to achieve significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods in terms of both reconstruction quality and speed.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Another major addition to the city's museum scene is the Museum of Remembrance and Tolerance (Museo de la Memoria y Tolerancia), inaugurated in early 2011. The brainchild of two young Mexican women as a Holocaust museum, the idea morphed into a unique museum dedicated to showcasing all major historical events of discrimination and genocide. Permanent exhibits include those on the Holocaust and other large-scale atrocities. It also houses temporary exhibits; one on Tibet was inaugurated by the Dalai Lama in September 2011.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: First time! After asking some fellow YELPERS where do I go... they didnt point me in the wrong direction! the place is small. but I like that. makes me feel welcome. as soon as you walk in you can see the pride and passion of the owners and the employees. they really care about what they do and the people they serve. It is all about the people and the food. I was there at 4:30pm so there was no line and I was greeted with a smile and immediately seated. I decided to go with the big burger which was 8 bucks. it came with a side of fries. you also have the choice of a side salad or cole slaw. I went with the fries. they are served with a special sauce that I tried not to be in love with. but I could not help myself. I was in love with it. the fries are also seasoned with something that makes you just want to keep going. I felt like I was being watched to see if I liked it. LOL! so I made sure I showed them how much I loved it. my burger was good. cooked the way I asked. the buns were fresh. the burger was made with fresh ingredients. I was happy. I was even more happy that I did not get a combo because I could not finish my fries. but I did enjoy them. I didnt get to try their signature drink the Smash because I had some errands to run. maybe next time. I am glad I found this place. I am also glad that I was able to enjoy this place with my wife and daughter. the next time you are in Santa Barbara and are hungry, make sure you stop by this place. I will be back there for sure!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [step] Massage your scalp while working the conditioner through your hair to stimulate blood flow and promote healthy hair growth. [step] Let the conditioner sit for at least 10-15 minutes before rinsing it out with cool water. [step] Use a wide-toothed comb or your fingers to detangle your hair starting from the ends and working your way up to the roots. [step] Apply a leave-in conditioner or hair oil to seal in moisture and protect your curls from dryness and frizz. [step] Avoid using heat-based styling tools such as blow dryers and flat irons as they can further dry out your hair. Opt for air-drying or diffusing your curls instead. [step] Use a satin or silk pillowcase to reduce friction and prevent breakage while you sleep. With these simple steps, you can keep your dry curly hair healthy, moisturized, and beautiful.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [I realise the entire premise for this post is completely hypocritical. I'm English and, shock horror, I like football. Yes I will call it football, and yes I know soccer is an English word. I could not care less about the name of the sport, it makes exactly 0 difference to my enjoyment] Hello CMV, I am of the opinion that the constant stream of debate on the positivesnegatives of Association Football as a sport have been the biggest driver behind American's apathy towards the sport. Nothing is worse than being told how weird or unusual you are for not liking a commonly popular thing, or being told that something is wrong with you if you don't. The American sporting fanbase has had to deal with a lot of this over the past 50 odd years with regards to football, and although this has slightly waned over the past 2 World Cups, I believe it is too late, and will now never be fully ingratiated into US sporting culture (compared to the classic sports). I believe the veiled snobbiness and general condescension from Euro football fans has contributed to this, but I also believe that the internet has created a 'Debate All Ad Nauseum' ethos which can be counterproductive to the growth of traditional hobbiesgamessports in a modern setting. So many articles like Why America Doesn't Like Soccer, And How That Can Be Changed' - Time Magazine] , [Is This Soccer's Moment in America? - WSJ] , and [Forget the World Cup Hype. America Will Never Embrace Soccer - LA Weekly] hinder a natural growth of interest in the history and traditions of football, which is a fundamental reason why the game is so popular. Who wants to be fed full of 'This could be popular because x viewer stats and of tweets per minute of the game', and then go look at Liverpool's success in the 80's? Nobody. Another reason is emotion. Being told to 'pick a side, pro football or anti football' creates an aura of national debate usually saved for Politics or Religion. Tarring a sport with this brush is a bad move, and does not help a casual fan from gradually falling in love with the game. It's a slow process, no-one transitions from knows-nothing to uberfan in a year. I believe a true love for a sport comes from following a team for a long period of time (thick and thin, ups and downs and all those lovely cliche) and wallowing in the success of others as a result of the time you personally have invested in a team. It's a slow and patient process. How is the average American supposed to casually follow the Premier League, if they are constantly being told to line up on a side and either be a full blooded Hooligan or a HandEgg Loyalist? Casualism is the backbone of football. I admit this opinion of mine was first formed a few years ago, and since then many of my American friends have started to follow the weekend results out of habit, which is up to them. I'm not telling them they have to like it, but I wish the media would stop constantly debating whether people should or shouldn't like it, for heavens sake. [sorry if I rambled, discovered this sub today and am in love] Hello, users of CMV! This is a footnote from your moderators. We'd just like to remind you of a couple of things. Firstly, please remember to [read through our rules] . If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. Speaking of which, [downvotes don't change views] ! If you are thinking about submitting a CMV yourself, please have a look through our [popular topics wiki] first. Any questions or concerns? Feel free to [message us] . Happy CMVing!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Long short-term memory (LSTM) and recurrent neural network (RNN) has achieved great successes on time-series prediction. In this paper, a methodology of using LSTM-based deep-RNN for two-phase flow regime prediction is proposed by introducing the temporal phase in different layers to train RNN model based on its output as input. The performance evaluation was performed with four real applications' data sets from three countries including US, Japan and China at 20 C and 40C. With using LSTM-based stage encoding function and combining two types of hierarchical structure networks: standard convolutional layer and an expansion layer containing depth-first search (DFS), a high accuracy up to 96 can be obtained through testing validation set when compared to previous works over these datasets. Abstract: This work proposes a method that combines Deep Neural Network (DNN) -generated feature maps with kernel density estimation techniques to identify part-to-whole relationships within vehicle assembly line processes automatically. Machine vision algorithms have been used successfully since decades; however, they are prone to significant variations across camera setups due to image noise or illumination changes which ultimately affect their results. A DNN system typically consists many hidden units, so we propose here how to use Kernel-based Localized Kernels, or KLKs, to segment images into relevant regions. For instance, such kernels could serve as local features extracted during training but also as initial seed points upon which higher level classifiers should operate. We then bridge the gap between the final classes produced by supervised learning models like Convolutional Networks (ConvNets). Our experiments show that our approach provides robust detection capabilities both under noisy conditions and even if not all parts being identified belong to one large object; furthermore it reduces False Acceptance Rate significantly while improving Positive Classification rate substantially. Moreover, our experimental evaluation shows that besides better generalization capability than state-of-theart methods, our method achieves excellent robustness among diverse scenes with only minor modifications required.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Very boring pizza, if you don't like garlic, oregano, any spices, and think ketchup is pretty good then this is the spot for you. I'm sorry to hear that you did not enjoy your pizza. Would you like to give some feedback to the management of the place where you had it? It is important to let them know about your experience so they can work to improve their food and service. In the meantime, perhaps you can try other pizza places that cater to your taste preferences.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Elon Musk revealed plans to create a self-sustaining city on Mars last week. It will likely use Starlink satellites for internet connectivity. According to the terms of Starlink's internet project, SpaceX will not recognize international law on Mars. The space company will adhere to a set of self-governing principles defined at the time of Martian settlement. The position is similar to a declaration put forward by the Earthlight Foundation, a non-profit organization committed to preparing for the expansion of humanity beyond Earth.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [substeps] Just as you don't want to put on clothes that are still warm from the dryer, try to avoid getting wet or sweaty during the day. This will cause unwanted moisture, potentially leading to discomfort and even skin irritations. Here are a few tips to avoid getting sweaty: 1. Choose breathable fabrics that allow airflow, such as cotton, linen, or bamboo. 2. Opt for lighter-colored clothing that won't absorb as much heat from the sun. 3. Wear clothing that is loose-fitting, so it doesn't trap heat against your skin. 4. Take frequent breaks in the shade, air conditioning, or a cool, well-ventilated area. By following these tips, you can keep your body cool and comfortable throughout the day, reducing the likelihood of unwanted moisture and skin irritations.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I've been able to as long as i've lived in my state (USA) and don't ever want to not be able to use them for recreational purposes or self defense. By self defense, I mean REAL self defense as in burglars entering your home with their own weapons. It seems perfectly alright to attack someone on your private property threatening you and trying to steal from you, or a similar situation. I think I should be allowed to hunt if I want, as long as i'm not a complete idiot about it. Safe hunting never hurts anyone, in my eyes. (i'm not here to talk about animal rights when it comes to hunting.) I'm not too big on public carrying, but if you have no criminal history or mental issues you should be allowed to get a public carrying permit. I don't see a big connection to firearm access and mass shootings. If someone was already mentally unstable enough to go kill a bunch of unarmed civilians, I don't think easier access to weaponry will straighten them out or solve anything in the long run for these people.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: People who climb mountains or fly in non-pressurized fixed-wing aircraft sometimes have supplemental O 2 supplies.[h] Passengers traveling in (pressurized) commercial airplanes have an emergency supply of O 2 automatically supplied by the plane's oxygen generators if there is a loss of cabin pressure. [i] 10 OF 10",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [step] Whether it be a family member, or a friend who's amazing at the subject you're in, getting a second opinion is important. They can tell you what they feel your grade should be.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Fran has five friends. One day, her friends told her they didn't like her. They forced her to make new friends. After a week, Fran had found a new friend. She is much happier with her one new friend.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Scunthorpe midfielder Neal Bishop has signed a one-year contract extension, securing his future with the club. Bishop, who joined Scunthorpe in 2015, has been a key player for the Iron, making over 150 appearances for the team. The 37-year-old's experience and leadership on the pitch has been instrumental in the club's success in recent seasons. Speaking about his contract extension, Bishop said: \"I'm absolutely delighted to extend my stay at Scunthorpe. It's a great club with fantastic fans, and I'm proud to be a part of it.\" Scunthorpe manager Paul Hurst also praised Bishop's contribution to the team, stating: \"Neal is a hugely important player for us, both on and off the pitch. His professionalism and dedication to the club is second to none, and he sets a great example for our younger players.\" The one-year contract extension is a testament to Bishop's continued commitment to Scunthorpe and demonstrates the club's confidence in his ability to help the team achieve their goals in the upcoming season. As Scunthorpe prepare for the start of the new season, Bishop's signing will be welcomed news to both the fans and the team. His presence on the pitch provides a stabilizing force for the Iron and his leadership will be invaluable to guiding the team forward. In summary, Scunthorpe's decision to extend Neal Bishop's contract is a smart move for the club. Bishop's experience and dedication to the team will undoubtedly be a key factor in their success this season.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Olympic silver medallist Samantha Murray recovered from a difficult start to remain on course for a first individual European pentathlon title, after displaying nerves of steel during the competition. The 31-year-old from Clitheroe, Lancashire stumbled out of the starting blocks in the opening discipline - the 200-metre freestyle swim - trailing in eighth place. However, a superb display of fencing saw Murray win 18 of her 24 bouts to lift herself into second place. Despite a below-average performance in the show-jumping, Murray remained in contention for the title and blanked out the nervousness that had been creeping in during the competition. Going into the final discipline, the grueling 3200-metre run, Murray was determined to give her all, and she did not disappoint. She worked her way through the field and emotionally crossed the finish line in second place, securing her first individual European pentathlon title. Speaking after the competition, a delighted Murray said, \"It's such an amazing feeling to win my first European pentathlon title. I had a difficult start with the swim, but I didn't let that get to me. I just focused on each discipline and gave it my all. I'm so proud of myself for staying calm and coming through in the end.\" Murray's victory is a testament to her determination and resilience, and she has now set her sights on further glory in future competitions. With the Olympic Games on the horizon, her impressive performance in this competition has certainly put her in strong contention for gold.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The iPSC Neurodegenerative Disease Initiative (iNDI) is a project that aims to stimulate, accelerate, and support research that will lead to the development of improved treatments and preventions for Alzheimer's and other dementias. The plan involves adding more than 100 genes linked to Alzheimer's and other dementias into stem cells from a wide variety of donors to see which genes contribute to the disorder. It will investigate how the genes activate, what proteins they code for, how those proteins interact, and more. All of the data from the project will be openly shared online for anyone to mine and interpret.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [step] The nail polish thinner will help to release any congealed nail polish, making it usable again. [title] Use as usual, until it's all gone. It says \"10 ml bottle,\" but I had a 20ml bottle (I think) so the ratio was 1:1 instead of 3:2 which is what they recommend on their website for this formula and most other polishes! It took me over half an hour to get through one coat: (",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: One day Sammy was playing around inside the house. She played even though her mom told her not to play inside. While playing, Sammy accidentally broke a vase! She was very upset. She went and told her mom. Her mom got very angry and said \"If you don't get your act together, I'm going to put you in the \"hand-cuffs. Sammy said \"I don't want to go to the \"hand-cuffs. Her mom said \"You will if you don't get your act together.\" Sammy's mom put her in the \"hand-cuffs.\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" Her mom said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\" After she was in the \"hand-cuffs\" she said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She said \"You're sorry and you're going to the \"hand-cuffs\"!\" She said \"I'm sorry mom.\" She went to the \"hand-cuffs.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: One of the later ruptures between Toghrul and Temujin was Toghrul's refusal to give his daughter in marriage to Jochi, the eldest son of Temujin, a sign of disrespect in Mongolian culture. This led to a falling out between the two leaders, and Toghrul ultimately allied himself with Temujin's enemies. Is there anything else I can assist you with?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Good service, good food, and great menu. By far better than Don Pedro's down the street. Come here quite often and every time food and service is great. I would say the owner is as friendly as it gets. He will always come out and say hello to you. We have had some great meals here. I've been going to this place for over 20 years. The owner is a true gentleman and the food is great. A very good combination. I have not tried their Don Pedro's down the street but I hear that it is better than this place. That is not surprising because Don Pedro's is on the same street as this restaurant. The difference is that Don Pedro's is a little more expensive. The only reason I give it a 4 star rating is because it is not as good as the Old Town Cafe. I have not been to the Old Town Cafe. However, I have been to the Famous Chicken Place down the street and it is a 5 star restaurant. This restaurant is very good but it is not as good as the Famous Chicken Place. That is a shame because it is on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. The Famous Chicken Place has good food and the owner is a true gentleman. I would give this restaurant a 4 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant twice and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you. The restaurant has a nice atmosphere. The only thing that is missing is a full bar. That would make this restaurant a 5 star restaurant. I would give this restaurant a 5 star rating if it were not on the same street as the Famous Chicken Place. I have eaten at this restaurant once and it is very good. The food is great and the owner is a true gentleman. He always comes out to greet you.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: holds the pose for a few seconds before dropping it to the ground. The first to catch it wins the game. Hold hands in a circle and sing the song with everyone jumping on the word 'Ho'. No one must move on the word 'He'. And a hey nonny no and a hey nonny no. Change the direction of the song every 2 counts.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I really try to be understanding about food taking some time. I am very willing to wait for quality food. Its actually my tagline for yelp...however, this place takes too long and the customer service is unbelievably poor.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Newcastle has three cathedrals, the Anglican St. Nicholas, with its elegant lantern tower of 1474, the Roman Catholic St. Mary's designed by Augustus Welby Pugin and the Coptic Cathedral located on Wingrove road in Fenham. The Quayside is a newly regenerated area with an abundance of attractions.The newly relocated BALTIC Centre for Contemporary Art is a must see. St. Mary's Lighthouse and the Swing Bridge are also worth a visit. The Quayside Seaside is an area of the quayside close to the Millennium Bridge which has been transformed into a beach in summer. You can grab a deckchair, build a sandcastle and enjoy an ice cream or fish and chips. BALTIC, a new centre for contemporary art, is located on the south bank of the river Tyne adjacent to the Gateshead Millennium Bridge and occupies a former flour mill. BALTIC presents a constantly changing calendar of exhibitions and events. The North East has always had a reputation for its warmth and hospitality, and the City of Newcastle has long been famed for its nightlife. Now, there is a whole new reason to visit the city as the 100 million MetroCentre QEII leisure and entertainment venue, right in the heart of Newcastle, opens its doors. MetroCentre QEII is set to take the city into a whole new era of leisure and entertainment. With its own Metro Station, the MetroCentre QEII is linked to Newcastle City Centre and the MetroCentre in Gateshead. This stunning Grade I listed building is one of the finest monuments to the Industrial Revolution in the North East. Designed and built by the great British engineer Robert Stephenson, the High Level Bridge was completed in 1849 and spans the Tyne, linking Newcastle with Gateshead. The seven million pound transformation of the Tyne and Wear Building has been completed. The building is now fully accessible to disabled visitors and the galleries are much more spacious. The Museum of Antiquities contains the archaeological collections of Newcastle University and the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne. The galleries tell the story of the Roman occupation of northern England, and the emergence of the early medieval kingdom of Northumbria. The Newcastle United Museum is situated in St. James' Park, home of Newcastle United Football Club. The museum celebrates the heritage of Newcastle United Football Club and displays the club's three FA Cup trophies, won in 1910, 1924, and 1955, as well as other artefacts. The National Trust's Gibside is a Georgian 'grand design', landscape garden and haven of peace and tranquillity. A must for all visitors, Gibside is one of a series of great 18th Century landscape gardens that grace the Tyne Valley. The Gateshead Millennium Bridge is the world's first and only tilting bridge! Designed by Wilkinson Eyre Architects and engineered by Gifford, the bridge takes its place at the end of a line of distinguished bridges across the Tyne, including the High Level Bridge and the Tyne Bridge. The Castle Keep is one of the finest surviving examples of a Norman keep in the country and offers stunning views of Newcastle from its rooftop. The Black Gate is a Scheduled Ancient Monument and a Grade I listed building. It is one of the few buildings from Newcastle's medieval past remaining in the city. It is a very rare example of a fortified gatehouse and is the only one of its type left in the whole of Britain. The Tyneside Cinema was built in 1937 in the Art Deco style. Today, it is the last surviving newsreel cinema still operating as a cinema full time in the UK. The Victoria Tunnel is a preserved 19th century wagonway under the city from the Town Moor to the Tyne, built to transport coal from Spital Tongues (Leazes Main) Colliery to riverside jetties, now accessed from Ouseburn. The tunnel is now a scheduled ancient monument. The Discovery Museum is the North East's biggest free family attraction. It is located in Blandford House, a listed building built in the 1820s, which was originally a coal drops. The Great North Museum, which incorporates collections from",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [step] Let the fish marinate for at least 30 minutes, or up to 2 hours for more flavor. [title] Preheat a pan over medium-high heat, and add a tablespoon of oil. [step] Once hot, add the marinated fish, along with any remaining marinade, to the pan. [title] Cook the fish for 3-5 minutes on each side, until it is fully cooked and golden brown. [step] Serve immediately, garnished with fresh herbs and a squeeze of lime juice for extra flavor. Enjoy your delicious lime-infused fish dish!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: grab a cup and turn the sink on.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I'll start by saying I'm 26male. I fully support equal rights but am neither a feminist nor an MRA. I believe feminism has defaulted to playing the \"victim\" card at any and all possible situations. They have realized that speaking as a perpetual victim actually gives you a leg up in modern day society. On top of that, they understand that labeling dissenters as evil will advance their cause. A few examples of what i'm getting at: Disagree with an opinion of a feminist? MISOGYNIST!!!! Do you prefer sexually conservative women? SLUT SHAMER!!!!! Don't agree with me? BIGOT!! When you immediately label people with hate terms (like feminists love to do) you alienate them. Perhaps they could look at things your way, but when you start the conversation by labeling them as bad people, of course they don't care what you have to say. Overall, this attitude alienates people from feminism (which is supposed to be about equal rights, not about complaining about how a joke was made at your expense). If Feminists would hold intelligent conversations instead of dismissing any dissenting opinion, they may actually make progress with the people they're trying to reach. Instead, Feminists label them as misogynists and in turn lose most of the demographic they're trying to reach. Edit: Thank you all for your responses. It seems people want examples. I purposely left specific examples out because I did not want someone to refute my example and consider the argument complete. I'll give you two of the things that annoy me: 1. The recent \"blurred lines\" spoof that has made the rounds has an opening line of \"every bigot shut up.\" I see this as saying, \"if you don't agree with what I'm about to say, you're obviously a bigot and therefore your opinion is invalid.\" Someone like me, who may be on the fence about their message and open to persuading, is instantly turned off to the message because those women have labeled dissenters as hateful people, which is not necessarily true. 2. The concept of \"male privilege\" irks me in general, but specifically when a women complains about the blanket statement of 'women are bad drivers'. Get a sense of humor and realize that everyone makes jokes at the expense of others. To label someone who jokes about something so freaking trivial as that as a misogynist is exactly what I'm talking about. I definitely believe feminism has many great points. I think that the most important current issue facing females is the rape culture outside of places such as the US or Britain. When I see someone on reddit focusing on how she didn't want to get hit on (and of course the guy who cat called her was a mysogynist) it leads me to roll my eyes and think that this person is completely missing the point",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: If you enjoy great Southern cuisine,this will be the place for you! the food is amazing...the service is perfect...and the ambience is excellent! I enjoyed the beef short ribs...and a wonderful arugula salad with feta..SO fresh!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Richard Hammond couldn't believe his luck when he inherited a fortune from his father's side of the family. He always dreamed of playing God and doing something game-changing. So, he decided to invest in the most ambitious project ever: Jurassic Park, but with a twist. He didn't want to limit the experience to the rich only. Richard enlisted the help of his fellow Top Gear presenters, Jeremy Clarkson and James May, to come up with ideas to make Jurassic Park accessible to car enthusiasts on a budget. The first idea was to introduce high-speed car tours into the park. Guests could hop onto a specially modified Jeep with a professional guide and get up close and personal with some of the most ferocious-looking prehistoric creatures roaming the land. The second idea was to have a car show featuring some of the best car models in history. Guests would get to see the cars up close while learning about the different features and designs that made them legendary. But things got out of hand when the trio decided to implement a third idea: car racing. When they heard that other parks had started hosting car races, Top Gear took it as a challenge, and true to form, they went all out. They designed custom-made, high-performance cars inspired by the prehistoric giants and had a competition to see who could come up with the fastest car. They then had races through the park, with the winners taking home a coveted trophy and bragging rights. The park was a massive hit, with visitors coming from all over the world to experience the thrill of Jurassic Park Top Gear Edition, and Richard Hammond realised he had created something truly special. John Hammond would have been proud, but he needed to accept that his newphew's concept was way ahead of its time.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The second main legislative body is the Council, which is composed of different ministers of the member states. The heads of government of member states also convene a \"European Council\" Thank you for the additional information. Is there anything else you need help with?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Hearing an announcement from God is weird ya know? One minute you're going about your normal day, the next a booming voice tells you that in 24 hours something huge will happen. So much changed in those 24 hours. That simple sentenced that boomed across the skies changed the world. God had been proven to be real. That alone impacted us significantly. Atheism had been eradicated in a matter of words. No one could doubt what had happened. Of course, people still fought over which God had said those words, but the arguments were short, with each person concluding that it was their God who had said it. In the next 23 hours, the world seemed to have changed for the better. Wars stopped. If you were fighting, you definitely couldn't be there to see the big thing that was to happen. Everyone seemed so at peace. Everyone was happy. People worldwide waited for the event. Everyone stopped working. But, of course, people needed light and food. So, for the sake of that one day, everything was made free. The richest of the rich and the poorest of the poor could now get the same items in that single day. Every one person was equal. Every one person was waiting for the event. In peace and prosperity, the world waited patiently. And finally, the event came. At first, no one noticed anything different. Everything seemed normal. Nothing had changed. But one by one..... people noticed the peace. The prosperity. Enemies were sitting next to each other. But they held no hatred towards one another. What they held was compassion. Love, even. Yes, enemies became friends. Warring countries became the closest of allies. All was well with the world. And the people, they noticed. The big event was this. Everyone loved one another. Hatred had been eradicated. An event greater than that could certainly not happen. And it never did. No one even knows if it was actually God who announced it. He was never heard from again. The world was at peace. And it was all thanks to a couple of words.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Harold had always hated fruits and vegetables. He preferred to eat meat instead of fruit and vegetables. Finally his friend recommended he try a Honeycrisp apple. Fred was amazed by the taste, texture, and color. Now every time Harold went grocery shopping for apples on special sale days at Wal-Mart or Kroger's he would pick up one bag of them when they were half off before going home. He ate that way until about six months ago while visiting with an old high school classmate whom he hadn't seen in over twenty years. His name is Don Wills; besides being my Dad's buddy from grade school we are also both members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS). In our conversation I told him how much I enjoyed eating those delicious apples which I'd been buying whenever they were reduced 50 then putting away so as not to waste any more food than necessary during this period of financial strain brought upon us due to COVID-19. As soon as it left his mouth he said \"I have some butternut squash growing outside, you want me to save enough seed to plant next year?\" My reply: \"SURE!\" So now here comes Thanksgiving Day! And there will be plenty of fresh roasted turkey along with all its trimmings including my baked pumpkin cheesecake dessert made especially just for this day. It can even be frozen if desired because once cooled it does continue to maintain firmness well into December without becoming too soft like other desserts do around Christmas holidays where ice cream may need to be added back to give needed additional fluidity. So, Happy Thanksgiving everyone!!!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Richard Phillips Feynman (fanmn; May 11, 1918 - February 15, 1988) was an American theoretical physicist known for his work in the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics, and the physics of the superfluidity of supercooled liquid helium, as well as in particle physics for which he proposed the parton model. For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman, jointly with Julian Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965. He developed a widely used pictorial representation scheme for the mathematical expressions governing the behavior of subatomic particles, which later became known as Feynman diagrams. During his lifetime, Feynman became one of the best-known scientists in the world. In a 1999 poll of 130 leading physicists worldwide by the British journal Physics World he was ranked as one of the ten greatest physicists of all time.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This review is for a visit and not a stay. I thought this was a fun casino here at the rio, it's off the main strip but worth a visit! I liked the I-Bar (we had full table service here for a birthday party so all I could drink was covered and top shelve...even better!!) bartenders and servers were all nice. Enjoyed the world buffet, many choices of food here. The buffet attracts crowds here so expect a wait in line. The mardi gras flying floats are a lot of fun, and I had a great time at the rooftop club Voodoo Lounge great views but pricey up there. All in all I enjoyed my time here and even left with a little more money then I arrived with, even better!!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: If you find yourself deviating from those qualities, slow down and regain your composure. [substeps] For example, if you want to be a more patient person, come up with a plan to practice patience in stressful times, such as counting to ten.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: She knew she was a failure. Her parents always told her so. She tried hard sometimes, but it did no good. They continued to berate and judge her. She gave up, knowing it was what they wanted.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The Air Force and Northrop Grumman have announced that they are one step closer to collecting solar power in space and beaming it to Earth using radio frequency (RF). Their technology involves a 'sandwich tile' that converts solar energy to RF. The power can then be beamed to a receiving station on the ground and collected using a rectifying antenna that will convert it into usable power. A test of the technology is predicted to launch in 2025.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [substeps] Vaseline makes a good natural makeup remover. Rub it over the areas of your face with heavy makeup and wipe it off with a cotton ball.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Liverpool, one of England's most successful football clubs, lived up to their reputation on Wednesday evening, overpowering Championship side Burton Albion in a thrilling EFL Cup second-round encounter. The match, held at the Pirelli Stadium, witnessed a masterful performance from the Reds, who advanced to the tournament's third round with a comfortable 3-0 victory. Jurgen Klopp's men began the game with a high tempo, indicating their intentions from the outset. They dominated possession for the majority of the first half, patiently waiting for openings while keeping their opponents at bay. Liverpool's persistence paid off in the 23rd minute when Virgil van Dijk powered the ball into the top-right corner of the net, putting Liverpool ahead. Burton Albion fought back valiantly and had a chance to level the score when John Brayford's header hit the crossbar. The hosts continued to push forward after the break, with forward Kane Hemmings coming inches away from scoring. Despite Albion's attempts to get back into the match, Liverpool's class shone through in the second half. They scored two more goals, with Xherdan Shaqiri and Diogo Jota finding the back of the net in quick succession. Liverpool demonstrated their credentials as a formidable team with their solid defensive display. The Reds were dominant in all areas of the pitch, with goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher not being called upon to make many saves. Jurgen Klopp's team showcased their depth and skill as they made substitutions in the second half, with James Milner and Neco Williams coming on for Liverpool. The Reds held their nerve to secure a comfortable win that sends them through to the next round. The victory gives Liverpool momentum and an added confidence boost ahead of their next Premier League game against Chelsea on Saturday. Klopp was pleased with his team's performance and progression in the tournament, and he will be hoping to build on this success in the coming weeks. In summary, Liverpool was relentless throughout the game, making their mark in the second round of the EFL Cup. Burton Albion battled admirably, but Liverpool proved too strong and efficient, booking their place in the next round with class and composure.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The hygiene hypothesis attempts to explain the increased rates of asthma worldwide as a direct and unintended result of reduced exposure, during childhood, to non-pathogenic bacteria and viruses. It has been proposed that the reduced exposure to bacteria and viruses is due, in part, to increased cleanliness and decreased family size in modern societies. Exposure to bacterial endotoxin in early childhood may prevent the development of asthma, but exposure at an older age may provoke bronchoconstriction. Evidence supporting the hygiene hypothesis includes lower rates of asthma on farms and in households with pets.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [substeps] You could say, \" I'd like to discuss where our relationship is headed. Can we sit down and talk about it soon? \" that helps clue your partner into your desire to have a serious conversation about the direction of your relationship. Make sure to pick a time and place where you can have a calm and thoughtful discussion. Remember that honesty and open communication are key in any relationship, and it's important to respect each other's feelings and perspectives.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 18