Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
messages
list
enable_thinking
bool
id
string
source
string
sample_index
int64
step_idx
int64
num_steps
int64
label
string
correct
bool
loss_weight
float64
reward
float64
[ { "role": "user", "content": "# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM). You are given a\nproblem and a step-by-step solution that may be only a **partial trace** -- a prefix\nof a longer reasoning chain that can stop in the middle of a step. Judge whether the\nreasoning sho...
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
0
4
37
yes
true
1
0.875
[ { "role": "user", "content": "# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM). You are given a\nproblem and a step-by-step solution that may be only a **partial trace** -- a prefix\nof a longer reasoning chain that can stop in the middle of a step. Judge whether the\nreasoning sho...
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
0
12
37
yes
true
1
0.875
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
0
16
37
yes
true
1
0.875
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
0
20
37
yes
true
1
0.875
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
0
28
37
yes
true
1
0.875
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
1
12
55
yes
true
1
0.875
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
bb520714cd137b5b
polaris
1
16
55
yes
true
1
0.8125
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
d9a6c07fb72aec89
polaris
0
12
38
yes
true
1
0.5
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
d9a6c07fb72aec89
polaris
0
24
38
yes
true
1
0.625
[{"role":"user","content":"# Role\nYou are an expert evaluator acting as a process reward model (PRM(...TRUNCATED)
false
3cd039cbbf4fda4c
polaris
0
0
45
yes
false
1
0.3125
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

MC-value PRM dataset — context mode: full_cot

Data for training an in-context / policy-conditioned Monte-Carlo value PRM. Each row's query is a partial reasoning prefix; the target reward = V = P(correct | prefix), the Monte-Carlo value estimated from branched Qwen3.5-4B rollouts on Polaris math problems. The user prompt additionally carries a "# Other attempts by the same model at this problem" block — the ablation variable.

Context for this variant: Up to K=4 OTHER attempts' full chain-of-thought (reasoning), middle-truncated (head+middle+tail with '[... omitted ...]' markers). No correctness labels.

Filtered to uncertain prefixes: only rows with MC value V ∈ [0.1, 0.9] are kept — the signal region where the value function must actually discriminate. (V is otherwise strongly bimodal at 0/1: ~53% of prefixes are V=1 and ~17% are V=0, which carry little training signal.) MC values come from the offline math_verify + judge relabeling of the generate-only rollouts.

All variants (none, full_cot, solution, solution_label, memento) are built from the SAME prefixes / MC values / problem-id split, so the only difference is the context block (see the sibling repos asingh15/prm-mc-value-context-*). Context excludes the prefix's own base sample (no leakage) and is budgeted so the query prefix + verdict always fit the context window.

Columns

  • messages: chat turns — user = the judge prompt (role + rules + problem + context + partial solution), assistant = a single "yes" placeholder verdict token (the trained readout position).
  • reward: float in [0.1, 0.9] — the soft MC value target V (P(yes) regresses to this).
  • correct: bool = V >= 0.5.
  • id: problem id · sample_index: which base rollout the prefix was cut from · step_idx / num_steps: the prefix cut · source: polaris · label: "yes" · loss_weight: 1.0 · enable_thinking: false.

Splits

train = 21996 rows · validation = 876 rows (held out by problem id).

Built by inference/curate/build_prm_mc_context.py --context-mode full_cot.

Downloads last month
31