id
int64
4.13M
59.9M
origin_label
stringclasses
2 values
target_text
stringlengths
2.18k
9.71k
annotator_prediction
stringclasses
2 values
annotator_confidence
int64
1
5
15,922,179
lose
By virtue of operating a mobile phone network, AT&T knows its customers’ real- time locations because it has to collect that information to provide service to its customers’ cellular phones. Cellular phone networks work by routing phone calls, text messages, and data for email messages, Internet browsing, mobile ...
lose
3
14,726,408
win
Defendant specializes in flowback and well testing for oil and natural gas energy producers throughout the United States, including Pennsylvania and Ohio. To complete their business objectives, Defendant employed independent contractors. Many of the individuals who worked for Defendant, were paid on a day-rate ...
win
5
6,121,552
win
- en Ol u.. s: I- <( 13 UJ () <( UJ 0 L() ('") 17 The San Diego City Council did not design or intend for Municipal Code 18 19 §54.0110 ("Illegal Encroachment" or "MC §54.011 O") to be used against people 20 living on the street. It is an obscure ordinance intended to address trash cans and 21 du...
lose
2
59,756,995
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following class, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant Convergent sent a collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. containing decept...
win
4
15,692,982
win
Estee Lauder is liable under the FLSA for, inter alia, failing to properly compensate Plaintiff and other Representatives. There are many similarly-situated current and former Representatives who have been underpaid in violation of the FLSA and who would benefit from the issuance of a court- supervised notice of ...
win
3
6,623,841
lose
Plaintiffs repeat, reiterate and incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered oo1" through"z3" herein with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein. Upon information and belief, Defendants, on behalf of a third-party, began efforts to collect an alleged consumer debt fro...
win
4
4,325,010
lose
An order certifying that Count I may be maintained as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and appointing Plaintiff and the undersigned counsel to represent the Plaintiff Class as previously set forth and defined above; On or about August 11 2005, the Plaintiff allegedly incurr...
lose
4
15,780,637
lose
12 13 14 15 16 '7 18 '9 20 21 11 CHARLES E. WARD; FELICIA VIDRJO and ) PAUL BRADLEY, individ11y. and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) V. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., and Does 1 through ) 25, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. .. ) CaseNo.: Pilots employed by Defendants are r...
win
1
4,609,649
win
Sito is a company specializing in mobile location-based advertising and mobile messaging. Sito provides a platform serving businesses, advertisers and brands, and allowing them to create real-time targeted content based on location, interests, behaviors and loyalty. Via the platform, Sito delivers display adver...
lose
3
6,121,168
win
(Class Action Alleging Violations of the PWMA) A. PMWA COVERAGE 120. All previous paragraphs are incorporated as though fully set forth herein. 121. The PMWA Class is defined as: (Class Action Alleging Violations of the Ohio Acts) A. OHIO ACTS COVERAGE (Collective Action Alleging FLSA Violations) A. FLSA C...
win
3
6,162,776
win
This action is brought as a class action. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of MRS BPO, L.L.C. and thos...
lose
4
6,989,214
win
(Fair Labor Standards Act Violations) (Violations of Ohio Revised Code 4111.03) Defendant is a home health care business. 4 Plaintiff Carmel Solis was employed by Defendant between 2012 and January 15, 2018. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a home health aide. Other ...
win
2
7,708,368
win
As hourly nonexempt manufacturing employees of Defendant, Plaintiff and others similarly situated, have the primary duties of performing manual manufacturing tasks in the production of Gates’ products. This primary duty established the Plaintiff and others similarly situated as being entitled to overtime pay under...
win
3
14,588,500
win
Plaintiff brings claims for relief as a collective action pursuant to FLSA Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all non-exempt persons employed by Defendants on or after the date that is six years before the filing of the Complaint in this case as defined herein (“FLSA Collective Plaintiffs”). At all re...
win
3
4,398,927
lose
Defendants Bombay Pizza Company, LLC d/b/a Bombay Pizza Co.; Bombay Pizza Company Telfair, LLC and Sovijai, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Bombay Pizza Co.”) own and operate restaurants located in the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. Defendants Viral Patel and Sonali Patel are officers and/or director...
win
2
4,606,413
lose
At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of Florida. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (39). The text message received by Plaintiff originated from telephone number 267-613- 9146, which is owned and/or controlled by Defendant. Further...
win
1
17,085,873
win
 Defendants  refused  to  pay  Plaintiff  and  those  similarly  situated  overtime  wages   for  hours  worked  beyond  forty  each  workweek  and  beyond  twelve  each  workday.      Rather,   Defendant   only   paid   overtime   wages   when   an  employee   exceeded   80   hours   in   a   two-­week   period,   ra...
lose
2
6,131,449
win
Prior to sending the form letter, Defendant knew: Plaintiff’s home address and phone number; and upon information and belief, the home address and phone number of the class members. Plaintiff brings this action individually, and pursuant to F.Civ.R.P. 23(a), (b)(2), and (b)(3). The class under the first claim fo...
win
3
17,132,723
lose
To complete its business objectives, Ascent hires personnel, such as Rhiel, to perform services on its oil and gas ventures. Ascent does not hire these workers on a project-by-project basis. Rather, Ascent hires and treats these workers just like regular, even if sometimes short-term, employees. Many of the...
win
1
8,347,031
lose
The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. While the exact number of Class members is unknown to Plaintiff at this time and can only be ascertained through appropriate discovery, Plaintiff believes that there are at least thousands of members in the proposed Class. Reco...
lose
4
18,690,698
win
Yet in violation of this rule, Defendant fails to obtain any express written consent prior to sending autodialed text messages to consumers, such as Plaintiff. In placing the calls that form the basis of this Complaint, Defendant utilized an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS” or “autodialer”) in violation...
lose
4
17,380,666
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. Exclud...
win
3
6,769,191
win
Plaintiff and those similarly situated worked for a base salary in addition to commissions based on their sales numbers. Plaintiff Paul White was paid $50,000.00 per year plus commissions. Plaintiff and those similarly situated worked over forty (40) hours routinely and with Defendant’s knowledge and behest ...
win
3
15,765,595
win
The amount of the debt; Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have ...
lose
2
6,381,426
lose
This matter is properly maintainable as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) in that: (a) The Putative Class, which potentially includes in excess of sixty persons, is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (b) There are substantial questions of law and fact common to the Putative Cl...
lose
2
4,264,900
win
Plaintiff Christopher Coleman files this case as an opt in collective action, as is specifically allowed by 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). The class that Plaintiff Christopher Coleman seeks to represent may be described as follows: All current and former employees of Defendant who 1) worked as a Police Dispatcher during t...
lose
1
59,176,160
lose
In and around September 2020, via the telephone number 301-368-****, Marketpro or a person acting at its direction or control sent the following generic text message to mobile telephone subscribers: Hi. I am with MarketPro Homebuyers, I am a local buyer in DC, VA, MD. I’d like to speak with you about buying [prope...
win
4
15,007,399
lose
EY is an accounting and consulting firm offering services to clients throughout the world. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a non-exempt AML at all times relevant hereto. Plaintiff worked in this capacity from approximately September 2016 through August 2017. Plaintiff and those similarly situated to...
win
2
6,248,631
lose
On or about August 7, 2012, Plaintiff withdrew funds from the ATM inside Brother’s Deli, located at 41 Market Street, Lynn, Massachusetts (the “Brother’s ATM”). At the time Plaintiff used the Brother’s ATM, it was owned and operated by Defendant. At the time Plaintiff used the Brother’s ATM, a fee notice was in...
win
3
5,849,049
win
Cory is in the business of providing the delivery of appliances, furniture, and other merchandise to its customers. Cory provides delivery services throughout the United States, and in Illinois specifically, for companies such as Bob’s Discount Furniture, Ethan Allen, Rooms to Go, Crate & Barrel, Carson Pirie Scot...
win
4
4,275,122
win
(Against All Defendants For Violations of Section 10(b) And Rule 10b-5 Promulgated Thereunder) (Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against The Individual Defendants) Aveo is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing cancer therapeutics. The Company’s lead ...
lose
3
6,827,835
lose
Defendant manufactures, labels, markets, promotes, advertises, and sells Barlean’s Greens Products. Defendant markets and labels the Products with the Representations described herein. The following images depict the Products and the uniform, material Representations made on the Products: B. Defendant’s F...
lose
2
18,686,970
win
On or about November 16, 2020, Defendant made a call to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 7799 (the “7799 Number”) using a prerecorded voice. When Plaintiff listened to the voicemail, he was easily able to determine that it was a prerecorded message. See Rahn v. Bank of Am., No. 1:15-CV-4485-ODE-JSA...
win
2
6,170,293
lose
Plaintiff pays for and maintains a cellular telephone number ending in 3436. Beginning in January 2013, Defendants began placing calls to Plaintiff's cellular telephone number, sometimes multiple times per day. During at least some of these calls, Defendants left a voice message for Plaintiff using artificial ...
lose
3
16,506,813
win
action for all unpaid overtime pay, 100% liquidated damages, and attorneys fees and costs arising out of the Plaintiffs' claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act; Finds that NPS is liable to the Plaintiff and all members of the proposed Rule 23 Upon information and belief Guzman, who was classified and paid by NPS as...
win
4
16,719,324
lose
Matador is an independent energy company engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas resources in the United States. Its operations “are focused primarily on the oil and liquids-rich portion of the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays in the Delaware Basin in Southeast Ne...
win
4
6,087,753
lose
The Local Union represents the Southwest Airlines Flight Attendants. Local 556 of the Air Transport Division of the TWU was chartered as a Local on October 13, 1981, in the city of Dallas. Plaintiff Jackson began the process of obtaining signatures on recall petitions in August of 2015. The effort was made in re...
win
2
4,322,363
win
. Violations New Yot~k Labor Law Nonpayrnent of Straight \Vages 190 et .\·eq. and (J50 et !>;eq. and "'12 NYCRR I C~unille Forest and the New York Class) Due to Defendants' violations of the NYLL, are entitled to recover from attorneys' and costs of the action, and Plaintiffs do not seek liquidated In em...
win
2
4,543,835
win
Halliburton is an oil and natural gas company operating worldwide and throughout the United States and employs oilfield personnel to carry out its work. For example, Plaintiff worked exclusively for Halliburton from approximately April 2015 to March 2015 and October 2015 until February 2016 as an oilfield contrac...
win
1
4,181,592
lose
California Copyright Law The facts in support of this action are based on Plaintiff’s review of publicly- available information. Based on a review of these documents, and as described in greater detail herein, Plaintiff believes that discovery will result in the production of many more inculpatory documents withi...
lose
3
4,196,477
lose
However, Defendant does not solicit individuals and businesses for their permission to list their information in its online directories. Instead, Defendant collects contact information from several data aggregation and collection companies, such as Acxiom and Infogroup. As such, Defendant publishes the informati...
win
3
14,904,844
win
As joint employers, Defendants provide home health care services to elderly and/or infirm individuals through home health care aides such as Plaintiff. Defendants serve clients in Connecticut. Defendants employ individuals as home health care aides within their clients' homes. The specific work assignments an...
win
2
6,174,054
win
(Class Action Alleging Violations of the PWMA) A. PMWA COVERAGE 119. All previous paragraphs are incorporated as though fully set forth herein. 120. The PMWA Class is defined as: (Class Action Alleging Violations of the Ohio Acts) A. OHIO ACTS COVERAGE (Collective Action Alleging FLSA Violations) A. FLSA C...
win
4
6,260,643
lose
The name of the original creditor to whom the account is owed: The Complaint contained the numerical code "1564980,, in the footer. See id. The Clerk of the Court issued a Summons on December 3, 2015. See Exhibit No. 2. RMC prepared the Summons. The Summons contained the numerical code "1564980" in the footer...
lose
5
13,247,414
lose
Plaintiff seek to represent a class of individuals (“the Class”) defined as follows: All persons in the United States, from four years prior to the filing of the instant Complaint through the date of the filing of the instant Complaint, to whom Defendant, using the Autodialer or another device with identical charac...
lose
3
6,454,460
win
(Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. – Telephone Consumer Protection Act) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) In an effort to solicit more clients on behalf of third parties, Defendants sent unsolicited text messages, without consent, to cellular telephones while using automatic telephone dialing equipment h...
win
3
16,199,405
win
On or about September 15, 2015, Defendant sent an unsolicited facsimile to Plaintiff using a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device. See Exhibit A. The Fax advertises the commercial availability and quality of Defendant’s new Musculoskeletal Newsletter. On that basis, the Fax is an advertisement ...
win
2
6,683,637
win
(FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938) (NEW JERSEY WAGE AND HOUR LAW) (NEW JERSEY WAGE PAYMENT LAW) Plaintiff and all Collective Group/Class Members have been employed by Defendant and worked as Laborers and/or Operators out of Defendant’s office/facility in the State of New Jersey. Defendant has failed to pay ...
lose
2
4,311,662
win
Named Plaintiffs bring this action for violations of the FLSA as a collective action pursuant to Section 16(b) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all persons presently and formerly employed by Defendants who were non-exempt employees, who were subject to Defendants’ unlawful pay practices and policies di...
lose
3
59,817,043
win
Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. that have received collection attempts from Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, for debts originating with Synchrony...
lose
3
6,230,462
lose
As background, it is generally accepted that female mammals (including humans) are born with a fixed amount or supply of eggs. As those eggs age, they lose energy. Energy is stored in mitochondria, so the loss of energy relates to the decline in mitochondrial function. One often used analogy is to that of a flas...
lose
1
4,182,861
win
Defendant is one of the nationwide credit reporting companies in the United States. 1 Defendant sells consumer Credit Reports to millions of American consumers annually. Defendant is a consumer reporting agency (“CRA”) that compiles and maintains files on consumers on a nationwide basis and, as such, is regula...
win
2
4,133,501
win
The Plaintiffs and members of the proposed class are (or were) cashiers at various Factor Sales’ owned grocery stores located in southwestern Arizona. By way of example: A. Plaintiff Juvera worked as a cashier for Factor Sales at the time of his termination in August, 2011; B. Plaintiff Nunez worked as a cashier for ...
win
3
6,789,207
lose
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of the class defined as follows: all past and current employees of defendant FCA who were dues paying members of the UAW impacted by the illegal, improper, and collusive conduct of FCA and the UAW in violation of th...
win
5
6,155,506
lose
(as to Donor No. 1’s claims) For the First Amendment claim, Donor No. 1 proposes to certify a class of all United States citizens who made anonymous donations to the Free Barrett Brown campaign. For the Stored Communications Act claim, Donor No. 1 proposes to certify a class of all United States citizens who m...
lose
2
4,182,750
lose
Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs of this complaint. Plaintiff brings this claim individually and on behalf of the proposed Class against Vigo. Vigo, as the designer, manufacturer, marketer, distributor, and/or seller, expressly warranted that its...
win
2
59,892,367
lose
Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the alleged Debt”). The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. ...
win
3
8,491,055
lose
Defendant owns, manages and/or operates the Hotel. As part of its operations, Defendant provides its customers and the public reservations services, including, but not limited to, the ability to reserve rooms online via the Website. Within the applicable limitations period, Plaintiff visited the Website ...
win
4
6,125,070
win
(Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act) (Violations of 29 CFR 516) Plaintiff KRISTY REYES, files this case as an “opt in” collective action, as it is specifically allowed by 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). The class that Plaintiff KRISTY REYES, seeks to represent may be described as follows: All current and former ...
win
3
4,411,256
lose
Published reports indicate that Defendant is working to have four business locations in Washington within a short period of time, and that Defendant will open at least four to six new business locations every few years. 90.060. This violation, per statute, is a per se violation of Washington’s Consumer Prote...
lose
2
31,101,329
win
Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendant and those companies and entities on whose behalf it attempts to collect debts and/or has purchased debts. Exc...
win
3
6,859,476
lose
Defendant has repeatedly placed calls using an ATDS and containing a prerecorded and/or artificial voice to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone (336) XXX-8932. Plaintiff’s number was and is assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). AMEX calls Plaintiff from telephone ...
win
3
6,386,854
lose
The 2015 FCC Order also clarified that telephone calls and text messages have the same protections under FCC rules, and that text messages are “calls” for purposes of the Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2) & (b)(3) on behalf of herself, on behalf of all others simil...
win
1
14,540,138
win
Plaintiff Abante is the owner and customary user of a cellphone number ending in 5154. At no time did Abante provide its cellphone number to Defendant or provide Defendant, or any of Defendant’s agents, with prior express consent to call. At all times relevant hereto, and for a period of at least thirty (30)...
win
3
6,251,435
lose
Paragraphs 1-102 are incorporated in this count. 104. Honeywell promised Honeywell-sponsored healthcare until age 65 for Pacheco, Hansen, and other class members who retired under the Honeywell- sponsored pension plan and the 2007 CBA or the 2010 CBA. 105. Honeywell-sponsored healthcare for plaintiffs Pacheco, Hans...
win
5
59,764,598
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following class, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of Texas; b. to whom Defendant ERC sent a collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. containing deceptively word...
win
3
4,274,807
lose
On or about March 10, 2010, Defendants transmitted by telephone facsimile machine an unsolicited fax to Plaintiff. A copy of the facsimile is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Defendants created or made Exhibit A which Defendants knew or should have known is a good or product which Defendants intended to and did in ...
win
2
6,182,029
win
Requiring SCS to hire a Court-approved, independent auditing company to (a) investigate all allegations of TCPA violations, and (b) audit no less than 10% of SCS’s outbound calls to ensure that SCS had consent and that the consumer had not previously asked that calls stop, and (c) report the results of the above i...
win
2
18,639,555
win
Each of the Plaintiffs are, and at all times mentioned herein were, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). Plaintiff Antista has possessed her current cellular telephone number for approximately 14 years. Plaintiff Antista received telephone calls on her cellular telephone on November 15, 2016, from te...
win
1
4,572,653
win
On or about December 15, 2014, Ms. Connolly applied for employment with Umpqua in Seattle, Washington. As part of the application process, Ms. Connolly was directed to sign a document that purported to be a combination disclosure and authorization to procure a background check on Ms. Connolly. A copy of this fo...
lose
1
59,938,973
lose
Plaintiff, repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1-41 as though fully set forth herein. Section 1692c(b) with certain inapplicable exceptions, prohibits debt collectors from communicating consumers’ personal information to third parties “in connection with the collection of any debt.” As discussed above and below...
win
1
6,454,318
win
Sometime before May 15, 2017, Plaintiff is alleged to have incurred certain financial obligations to the City of Tempe Utilities. These financial obligations were primarily for personal, family or household purposes and are therefore a “debt” as that term is defined by 15 U.S.C. §1692a(5). Sometime thereafter, b...
lose
2
15,763,201
win
On or about November 26, 2018, Defendant called Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 9978 (“9978 Number”) with a pre-recorded message. Upon Plaintiff answering the phone, a pre-recorded message asked Plaintiff to press 1 if she was interested in a vacation promotion. After Plaintiff pressed 1, she ...
win
2
5,302,405
win
Throughout Plaintiff’s employment with Belk, Plaintiff consistently worked more than 40 hours per workweek. Belk failed to keep accurate records of all hours worked by Plaintiff. Although Belk failed to keep accurate records of Plaintiff’s hours worked, Belk required, suffered, or permitted Plaintiff to work i...
win
2
18,467,886
win
Plaintiffs re-allege and re-aver each and every allegation and statement contained in paragraphs above of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. At all relevant times, upon information and belief, Defendants were and continue to be an employer engaged in interstate commerce and/or the production of goods fo...
win
1
6,302,733
lose
In the last line of the Collection Letter, in much smaller print, Defendant states, "The law limits how long a debt can appear on your credit report. Due to the age of this debt, we will not report payment or non-payment of it to a credit bureau." Nor did the letter inform Plaintiff that a partial payment on the ...
win
2
18,614,068
lose
Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom PCB sent a collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. while the consumer was in an active b...
win
3
4,181,279
lose
(Business & Professions Code §§ 17500, et seq. ‐  Untrue or Misleading Advertising)  (Unjust Enrichment)  (Violation of State Consumer Protection Statutes)  Throughout the Class Periods (as defined below), Bayer engaged in a  widespread marketing campaign to mislead consumers about the nature, composition,  and nut...
lose
3
7,469,050
win
Plaintiff was hired by Defendants in May 2016 as a Client Service Manager Senior. Plaintiff’s employment agreement was entered into with AJG “on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, divisions and affiliated and related companies”. A true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s “Employee Agreement” and Employment Offer ...
win
1
4,556,664
win
Defendants treated Plaintiff and all FLSA Plaintiffs similarly in that Plaintiff and all FLSA Plaintiffs: (1) performed similar tasks, as described in the “Background Facts” section below; (2) were subject to the same laws and regulations; (3) were paid in the same or similar manner; (4) were required to work in ex...
win
4
4,607,681
lose
Fitbit is manufacturer of activity trackers founded in 2007 and headquartered in San Francisco, California. Its products’ functions have included, among other things, step counting, distance calculating, calorie calculating, and sleep monitoring. In October 2014, Fitbit announced a new feature: wrist-based hea...
lose
3
4,520,234
lose
(Violations of the FDCPA) Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “20” herein with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein. Upon information and belief, Defendant, on behalf of itself or a third-party, began ef...
win
3
6,274,448
win
At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, the C...
win
1
6,122,663
lose
(Under NYTL § 1139 and 20 NYCRR §§ 534.2 and 534.8 for Violations of § 526.5(c)(4)) (Violations of GBL § 349) As relevant here, Costco’s coupon booklets were distributed in two different standard formats before the beginning of the Class Period: (i) the pre-August 8, 2013 format; and (ii) the format effective on...
win
4
4,553,998
win
Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Plaintiff seeks to prosecute his FLSA claims as a collective action on behalf of all persons who are or were formerly employed by Defendants as 3 ASMs at any time from three years from December 15, 2013, to the entry of judgment in this case (the “Collective Action Period”) (collect...
win
3
6,351,885
lose
During the call, Plaintiff was never informed that he may have his credit pulled, nor was Plaintiff informed of any reason that Cox would be pulling his credit. After learning of the pull, Plaintiff mailed Cox a letter stating that the inquiry was not authorized and requesting that Cox have the inquiry removed. ...
lose
2
6,352,146
win
OhDAP was initially established in 1990 under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300ff, et seq. This federal legislation has been renewed four times -- 1996, 2000, 2006 and 2009 -- and is now called the Ryan White Program within Ohio and nationwide. There are three main components wit...
win
2
4,291,985
lose
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 through 21 of the Complaint as though fully set forth herein. Plaintiff, Angelia Ruffin has been employed as security guard with Defendant, MotorCity Casino since on or about March 11, 2002. Plaintiff, Constance Hudson has been employed as security guard with D...
win
1
4,384,422
win
At all times relevant, Plaintiff was an individual residing in the State of Tennessee. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 2 The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (114 P.L. 74, 129 Stat. 584, 2015 Enacted H.R. 1314, 114 Enacted H.R. 1314), enacted into la...
lose
2
4,515,019
lose
On or about July 25, 2016 Defendant sent an advertisement to Plaintiff in the County of St. Louis, Missouri by facsimile transmission. A true and correct copy of the facsimile is attached as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference. 3 On or about August 16, 2016 Defendant sent an advertisement to Plaintif...
win
1
6,134,485
lose
Plaintiff is an individual, employed as a real estate agent. One aspect of Plaintiff’s job is that he must be constantly available via his cell phone Plaintiff frequently receives calls from numbers not saved in the contact list of known callers on his phone. He feels obligated to answer all calls received, i...
win
3
6,112,025
win
Clay Road Furniture LLC and Furniture 4 Everyone LLC paid Plaintiff Manolo Tayum straight time, not time and a half, for the hours he worked above forty (40) during his employment with defendants. Mr. Manolo Tayum’s job duties included delivering and setting up furniture and performing manual labor for defendant...
lose
2
7,333,332
win
Plaintiff answered the phone and was greeted by a prerecorded or artificial voice noting that he could be eligible to save money on his home energy bills by getting solar panels installed on his home and receive government credits to assist with the cost. After the prerecorded or artificial voice finished, a woma...
win
2
4,312,350
lose
(Terms and Conditions of Hertz’ Gold Plus Rewards Program) (Terms and Conditions for Use of Hertz’ Website) Hertz allows consumers to use its website, www.hertz.com, to make reservations for rental of cars and other motor vehicles. On a web page entitled, “THE HERTZ CORPORATION WEBSITE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDI...
win
1
6,552,355
win
Defendants treated Plaintiff and all FLSA Plaintiffs similarly in that Plaintiff and all FLSA Plaintiffs: (1) performed similar tasks, as described in the “Background Facts” section below; (2) were subject to the same laws and regulations; (3) were paid in the same or similar manner; (4) were required to work in ex...
win
2
59,899,832
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. Exclud...
win
3
6,129,885
lose
Upon information and belief, Exhibit A is a form letter, generated by computer, and with the information specific to Plaintiff inserted by computer. Exhibit A was the first letter GCS sent to Plaintiff regarding this alleged debt. Exhibit A includes the FDCPA debt validation notice. 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a). GC...
win
3
59,829,440
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following class, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New Jersey; b. to whom Defendant Convergent sent a collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. containing dece...
win
4
6,175,021
win
Chemmis Porter was an employee of RST Global Solutions Gulf of Mexico LLC, at its location in Sugarland, Texas. Chemmis Porter was not an independent contractor. No exemption to the provisions of the FLSA excused defendants from its obligation under the FLSA to pay Chemmis Porter time and a half for the hour...
win
1
59,909,458
win
Plaintiff, repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1-38 as though fully set forth herein. Section 1692c(b) with certain inapplicable exceptions, prohibits debt collectors from communicating consumers’ personal information to third parties “in connection with the collection of any debt.” As discussed above and below...
lose
2