Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.
GIS-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based GIS Automation Agents
Dataset Description
GIS-Bench is a benchmark framework designed to evaluate the capability of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents in automating GIS (Geographic Information System) tasks using the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
This benchmark was developed as part of a master's thesis research and targets real-world spatial analysis workflows executable in QGIS Desktop via Claude + MCP integration.
- Paper: GIS-Bench: LLM κΈ°λ° GIS μλν μμ΄μ νΈ νκ° λ²€μΉλ§ν¬ (KCC 2026, submitted)
- Repository: yiseo0/GIS-Bench
- License: CC BY 4.0
Benchmark Overview
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Total Tasks | 45 |
| Difficulty Levels | 3 (Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3) |
| Task Type | GIS spatial analysis & visualization |
| Output Format | HTML (Leaflet.js map), PNG, JPG |
| Evaluation Method | VLM-based automated scoring (Claude Sonnet) |
| Scoring | 130-point raw β 100-point normalized |
| Pass Threshold | 60 points (normalized) |
Evaluated Models
| Model | Condition | Pass Rate (Overall) |
|---|---|---|
| Claude (Sonnet) + QGIS MCP | Agentic | 100% |
| Claude (Sonnet) Baseline | No MCP | ~67% |
| GPT-5.2 Baseline | No MCP | ~69% |
Statistical significance confirmed via McNemar's test (p < 0.05)
Task Structure
Tasks are organized across 3 difficulty levels:
| Level | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Basic data loading & visualization | Load a shapefile and display on map |
| Level 2 | Spatial filtering & styling | Filter buildings by area > 500γ‘ with color coding |
| Level 3 | Multi-step spatial analysis | Buffer analysis + intersection + styled output |
Each task entry includes:
task_no: Task ID (1β45)prompt: Natural language instruction (Korean)level: Difficulty level (1, 2, or 3)
Data Sources
All spatial datasets used in this benchmark are sourced from Korean public data portals under open licenses.
| λ°μ΄ν°λͺ | μ€μ νμΌ | νμ | κ³΅κ° μ ν | μ’νκ³ | μΆμ² | λΌμ΄μ μ€ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μμΈμ CCTV μ€μΉ νν© | few_shot_test_μμΈμ μμ¬μ΄ CCTV μ°κ³ νν© |
CSV | Point | EPSG:4326 (WGS84) | μμΈ μ΄λ¦°λ°μ΄ν°κ΄μ₯ | 곡곡λ리 1μ ν |
| μμΈμ κ³ λμ§κ΅¬ κ²½κ³ | UQ123_μ©λμ§κ΅¬(κ³ λμ§κ΅¬)_20250805 |
SHP | Polygon | EPSG:5186 | κ΅ν μ 보νλ«νΌ | 곡곡λ리 1μ ν |
| μμΈμ νμ κ²½κ³ | μμΈμ_SIG.shp |
SHP | Polygon | EPSG:5186 | 곡곡λ°μ΄ν°ν¬νΈ | 곡곡λ리 1μ ν |
| μμΉνκ³ λͺ¨λΈ (DEM) | (B080)곡κ°DEM_34602_img_2025 |
GeoTIFF | Raster | EPSG:5186 | κ΅ν μ 보νλ«νΌ | 곡곡λ리 1μ ν |
| κ³ ν΄μλ μμ±μμ | Landsat_μμ±μμμ_μ κ·λ¬Όμ§μ_2024 |
GeoTIFF | Raster | EPSG:5186 | NASA EarthData | Public Domain |
All datasets are publicly available and free to use with attribution.
Note: μΌλΆ ν둬ννΈλ μ΄κΈ° μ€ν λΉμ μλ©("λμ¬μ" λ±)μ κ·Έλλ‘ μ μ§ν©λλ€. μ€μ μ¬μ© λ°μ΄ν°λ μμΈμ CCTV μ°κ³ νν©μ΄λ©°, μμ°μ΄ μ§μμ λͺ¨νΈμ±μ μ²λ¦¬νλ λ₯λ ₯λ νκ° μμμ ν¬ν¨λ©λλ€.
Evaluation Pipeline
Evaluation is performed using VLM-based automated scoring with Claude Sonnet as the judge model.
Scoring Criteria (130-point raw scale)
Basic Quality (100 pts)
| Criterion | Max Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
exists |
20 | Meaningful visualization present |
accuracy |
30 | Correct region and dataset used |
requirement |
30 | Color, filter, buffer conditions met |
completeness |
20 | Legend, title, labels complete |
Spatial Accuracy (30 pts)
| Criterion | Max Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
spatial_location |
15 | Data displayed in correct geographic area |
geometry_validity |
5 | No polygon/buffer distortion |
numeric_match |
10 | Numeric conditions reflected in output |
Normalization: score_normalized = round(total_raw / 130 * 100)
Each task is evaluated 3 times (N=3) and the average score is used for robustness.
See evaluation/eval_criteria.md for the full evaluation prompt and criteria details.
Reference Outputs
Since GIS tasks do not always have a single deterministic "ground truth," this benchmark provides reference outputs β screenshots generated by the benchmark author under each task condition. These serve as visual references for what a correct result should look like.
Reference screenshots are provided in assets/screenshots/ organized by model and task ID.
MCP Tool Dependency
This benchmark was conducted using QGIS MCP to connect Claude to QGIS Desktop.
- Tool: jjsantos01/qgis_mcp
- Description: MCP server + QGIS plugin that allows LLMs to control QGIS Desktop
- Note: The MCP tool code is not included in this repository. Please refer to the original repository for installation.
Repository Structure
GIS-Bench/
βββ README.md # This file (Dataset Card)
βββ data/
β βββ tasks.json # 45 task prompts with level labels
βββ evaluation/
β βββ run_evaluation_vlm_v3.py # VLM evaluation pipeline
β βββ eval_criteria.md # Scoring criteria & judge prompt
βββ results/
β βββ leaderboard.json # Evaluation results per model
βββ assets/
βββ screenshots/ # Reference output screenshots
Citation
If you use GIS-Bench in your research, please cite:
@inproceedings{gisbench2026,
title = {GIS-Bench: LLM κΈ°λ° GIS μλν μμ΄μ νΈ νκ° λ²€μΉλ§ν¬},
author = {κΉμ΄μ and μ₯λμ±},
booktitle = {νκ΅μ 보과νν νμ λ°νλ
Όλ¬Έμ§ (KCC 2026)},
year = {2026}
}
License
- Benchmark tasks, evaluation code, and results: CC BY 4.0
- Spatial datasets: 곡곡λ리 1μ ν (μΆμ² νμ 쑰건, κ° λ°μ΄ν° μΆμ² μ°Έμ‘°)
- QGIS MCP tool: Not included. See jjsantos01/qgis_mcp
- Downloads last month
- 109