text stringlengths 7 603k | embeddings listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|
The petitioner Darryl Whitaker's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 460 (AC 24485), is denied. | [
-0.019365854561328888,
-0.05676192417740822,
0.0006841574795544147,
0.025912674143910408,
0.05250685662031174,
0.0026385432574898005,
0.04587377607822418,
0.005483091343194246,
-0.014682063832879066,
-0.012908363714814186,
0.0030065872706472874,
0.040355317294597626,
-0.06672155857086182,
... |
The respondents' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 855 (AC 25128), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the petitioner's claimed liberty interest in parole eligibility status was sufficient to invoke the habeas court's su... | [
-0.0015839837724342942,
-0.0091482475399971,
-0.028766287490725517,
-0.0334588885307312,
0.06755899637937546,
0.02729162573814392,
0.04842907190322876,
-0.036012329161167145,
-0.01725568249821663,
-0.010698647238314152,
0.00532491272315383,
0.025414301082491875,
-0.03795361518859863,
0.051... |
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 626 (AC 25253), is denied. | [
-0.02913915552198887,
-0.04648387059569359,
-0.014553251676261425,
0.022803591564297676,
0.05454505607485771,
0.02400052733719349,
0.031048592180013657,
-0.015166725032031536,
-0.002716401591897011,
-0.021562611684203148,
-0.00066995935048908,
0.03696412965655327,
-0.05197504907846451,
0.0... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 808 (AC 24942), is denied. | [
-0.03349412977695465,
-0.0549539290368557,
-0.003026068676263094,
0.017910225316882133,
0.030445771291851997,
0.031410668045282364,
0.024266574531793594,
-0.010863440111279488,
-0.019775759428739548,
-0.026785947382450104,
0.0012944142799824476,
0.03951020538806915,
-0.06095912680029869,
0... |
The petitioner Angel Luis Ortiz' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 484 (AC 25331), is denied. | [
-0.00219772313721478,
-0.046465929597616196,
-0.00903825368732214,
0.015943333506584167,
0.04263852536678314,
-0.03057880513370037,
0.028290344402194023,
-0.016993414610624313,
-0.007530159316956997,
-0.01838890090584755,
-0.01432966161519289,
0.030514881014823914,
-0.03398071229457855,
0.... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 827 (AC 24643), is denied. | [
-0.006831806153059006,
-0.056001920253038406,
-0.006319007370620966,
0.022348307073116302,
0.04401015117764473,
0.018602214753627777,
0.04084436967968941,
-0.005678568501025438,
-0.011757698841392994,
-0.001904043136164546,
-0.006549861282110214,
0.06686938554048538,
-0.0623665377497673,
0... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 71 (AC 25668), is denied. | [
-0.031291414052248,
-0.03712035343050957,
-0.006738658063113689,
0.02444860152900219,
0.059786032885313034,
0.016845857724547386,
0.04203622043132782,
-0.011656834743916988,
-0.0011838917853310704,
-0.01536580827087164,
0.015069744549691677,
0.048967547714710236,
-0.05894201621413231,
0.08... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 714 (AC 25252), is denied.
Decided November 3, 2005
John Holdridge and Mark Rademacher, assistant public defenders, Michael K. Courtney and Barry A. Butler, senior assistant public defenders, in support of the petition.
Timoth... | [
-0.024452099576592445,
-0.020871084183454514,
-0.024974428117275238,
0.009787513874471188,
0.06142446771264076,
0.017640160396695137,
0.0344548374414444,
0.002634151838719845,
-0.008521096780896187,
-0.03275110200047493,
0.0040833065286278725,
0.038074344396591187,
-0.047219809144735336,
0... |
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 110 (AC 24082), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court's charge on conspiracy was deficient because it did not set forth an essential element... | [
-0.009951118379831314,
-0.037671737372875214,
-0.024543127045035362,
0.019422408193349838,
0.056491151452064514,
-0.029707081615924835,
0.04723731800913811,
0.0008599056745879352,
-0.017618678510189056,
-0.018067367374897003,
0.028209349140524864,
0.05967605859041214,
-0.04633020982146263,
... |
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine the proper framework for analyzing a claim of interference with an employee's right to reinstatement under the Connecticut Family and Medical Leave Law, General Statutes § 31-51kk et seq. (leave statute). The plaintiff, Cendant Corporation, appeals from... | [
0.0006944497581571341,
-0.04555540159344673,
-0.05298447981476784,
0.01621205359697342,
0.03592242673039436,
-0.012322386726737022,
0.03219693526625633,
0.020903663709759712,
0.0036264166701585054,
-0.045074183493852615,
-0.018580520525574684,
0.03453588858246803,
-0.0523761622607708,
0.05... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 17 (AC 25335), is denied. | [
-0.027072513476014137,
-0.04722561314702034,
-0.01676027663052082,
0.016257628798484802,
0.060434676706790924,
0.011249898932874203,
0.053006477653980255,
-0.008350779302418232,
-0.008534193970263004,
-0.022193456068634987,
0.007481920532882214,
0.05986176058650017,
-0.056098200380802155,
... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The petitioner, Melvin Mitchell, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) denied his petition for certification to appeal, (2... | [
-0.006944742053747177,
-0.007514203432947397,
-0.06602097302675247,
-0.01491613034158945,
0.05835773050785065,
-0.01141373347491026,
0.03720111399888992,
-0.03832504153251648,
-0.0032220236025750637,
-0.01889013685286045,
0.0033971185330301523,
0.033857740461826324,
-0.07385396957397461,
0... |
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Ronald Schiavo, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55a (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the jury charge was improper and (2) he was deprived of a... | [
-0.0010714865056797862,
-0.013731948100030422,
-0.035579413175582886,
0.02157033607363701,
0.065986268222332,
0.004723487421870232,
0.03079798072576523,
-0.008010667748749256,
0.007619789801537991,
-0.03728161007165909,
0.00919834990054369,
0.026814548298716545,
-0.05546620115637779,
0.016... |
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
These appeals concern claims raised by the defendants, Clifton E. Kennedy and Albert Lopez, who were codefendants at trial. The juiy found each defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), unlawful restraint in the second degree in violation o... | [
-0.0072495597414672375,
-0.034829623997211456,
-0.039891086518764496,
0.005441579036414623,
0.048310086131095886,
0.031748902052640915,
0.044522445648908615,
-0.004332044627517462,
-0.011816339567303658,
-0.020860493183135986,
0.003969243727624416,
-0.0020640078000724316,
-0.0519087277352809... |
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Tyree D. Preston, appeals from the judgments of the trial court revoking his probation and imposing a two year sentence of incarceration. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly found violations of probation and (2) abused its discretion in revoking his probati... | [
-0.010620521381497383,
-0.010002322494983673,
-0.05163665860891342,
-0.01824943721294403,
0.052234385162591934,
0.016805997118353844,
0.04922366887331009,
-0.005762649700045586,
-0.01067415252327919,
-0.024345211684703827,
0.00601898692548275,
0.04417290538549423,
-0.04312625527381897,
0.0... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Eric Kelsey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c and conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (3). On appeal, the defen... | [
-0.02048429846763611,
-0.01679924875497818,
-0.03675229102373123,
-0.004626273177564144,
0.07454012334346771,
0.03721310570836067,
0.0464775413274765,
0.04861666262149811,
0.015047935768961906,
-0.02234208583831787,
0.017491528764367104,
0.02513265796005726,
-0.05841038003563881,
0.0390718... |
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, Joseph Alexander James, entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charges of criminal attempt to possess a controlled substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 53a-49 and 21a-277 (b), and possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell in violation of Gen... | [
-0.03433874621987343,
0.017621660605072975,
-0.04185374081134796,
0.022787785157561302,
0.057077035307884216,
0.01777615025639534,
0.04698476195335388,
-0.020486757159233093,
0.006173003930598497,
-0.03973976522684097,
0.005072116386145353,
0.035405371338129044,
-0.0605652779340744,
0.0347... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner, Bruce Zoilo, appeals following the habeas court's denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment dismissing his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal.
On May 18, 1993, the petitioner was convicted of kidnapping in the first d... | [
-0.05449846014380455,
0.001229113433510065,
-0.07206860929727554,
-0.03164524957537651,
0.032900381833314896,
-0.0009780400432646275,
0.030643809586763382,
-0.03287766873836517,
-0.016325868666172028,
-0.008632538840174675,
-0.0021228406112641096,
0.04878249764442444,
-0.05599522590637207,
... |
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The pro se defendant, Daniel Henderson, appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly rejected his claims that (1) the ten year sentence enhancement pursuant to General Statutes § BSaAOb was illegal as i... | [
-0.0007938483613543212,
-0.030635269358754158,
-0.039453525096178055,
0.012884307652711868,
0.06755608320236206,
-0.003588237799704075,
0.048032958060503006,
0.015284246765077114,
-0.008258606307208538,
-0.014315853826701641,
-0.004995476920157671,
0.03327443078160286,
-0.07274887710809708,
... |
Opinion
SCHALTER, J.
The petitioner, Anthony Bowden, appeals following the denial by the habeas court of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) determined that he had received the effecti... | [
-0.026348283514380455,
-0.011236391961574554,
-0.047240160405635834,
-0.024469176307320595,
0.04582659527659416,
0.01017877459526062,
0.047559935599565506,
0.0003061576571781188,
-0.01344009954482317,
-0.0005727089592255652,
0.004794823471456766,
0.0195033960044384,
-0.04694302752614021,
0... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The petitioner, Benjamin Reid, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that the condition of his parole that his release not be "incompatible with the welfare of society" was... | [
-0.012203359976410866,
-0.025823796167969704,
-0.021939028054475784,
-0.025932487100362778,
0.030074408277869225,
0.018603522330522537,
0.0730929896235466,
-0.024861488491296768,
-0.021663106977939606,
-0.02757151797413826,
0.013904830440878868,
0.00465268874540925,
-0.07259166985750198,
0... |
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Maurice Flanagan, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1) and 53a-48 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to s... | [
-0.00521312840282917,
-0.036184392869472504,
-0.055926986038684845,
-0.015115177258849144,
0.03855056315660477,
0.00505914818495512,
0.04784821346402168,
0.004709622357040644,
-0.010991881601512432,
-0.022130869328975677,
0.037098418921232224,
0.031510092318058014,
-0.05057474225759506,
0.... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to revoke the commitment of her two minor children, P and W, and approving the permanency plan requested by the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner). On appeal, the respondent claim... | [
-0.011390899308025837,
-0.04711521044373512,
-0.016609063372015953,
-0.03342144191265106,
0.02462580054998398,
0.011398798786103725,
0.04232150316238403,
0.01671808399260044,
-0.016649125143885612,
-0.04442235082387924,
0.027010813355445862,
0.016061533242464066,
-0.03730049356818199,
0.04... |
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Vincente G. Morocho, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempt to commit sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-70 (a) (1), and burglary in the second degree in violation of General Statutes... | [
-0.025693083181977272,
-0.03665008768439293,
-0.028942683711647987,
-0.010085014626383781,
0.060079317539930344,
0.029778802767395973,
0.07140349596738815,
0.004634939134120941,
-0.016155952587723732,
-0.014378869906067848,
0.0067989337258040905,
0.007426318246871233,
-0.04535820335149765,
... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
This appeal arises out of a dissolution of marriage action between the plaintiff, Stephanie M. Adams, and the defendant, Bobbie L. Adams. The defendant challenges the trial court's judgment that, among other things, dissolved the marriage and divided the parties' marital assets. The defendant also ch... | [
-0.04286513850092888,
-0.023729857057332993,
-0.016619354486465454,
0.006222180090844631,
0.04784538596868515,
0.02801470272243023,
0.050912026315927505,
0.01737760566174984,
-0.01588120125234127,
-0.01699971966445446,
0.0030726343393325806,
0.02610861510038376,
-0.05452968180179596,
0.050... |
Opinion
BERDON, J.
The plaintiff, Robert E. Cushman, appeals from the postjudgment alimony orders of the trial court that stem from the parties' 1999 judgment of dissolution. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) inquired whether there was a substantial change of circumstances instead of conducting a de no... | [
-0.044248372316360474,
-0.028956320136785507,
0.0009843868901953101,
-0.020262807607650757,
0.06102284416556358,
0.05633769556879997,
0.04940435290336609,
-0.009539223276078701,
0.010445214807987213,
-0.015810931101441383,
0.012880727648735046,
0.055350903421640396,
-0.03880956768989563,
0... |
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court adjudicating three of her children neglected and committing them to the care, custody and guardianship of the petitioner, the commissioner of the department of children and families (commissioner). The respondent makes several claims ... | [
-0.04188885912299156,
-0.053956277668476105,
-0.018361428752541542,
-0.011169987730681896,
0.032349880784749985,
0.012641317211091518,
0.0001773027324816212,
-0.011268547736108303,
-0.051348160952329636,
-0.0484272763133049,
-0.013686664402484894,
0.04119802266359329,
-0.05468981713056564,
... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Carlos Rodriguez, Sr., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with the intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in viola tion of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b) and possession of narcotics with the intent to sell wit... | [
0.014608465135097504,
-0.019152630120515823,
-0.008850909769535065,
0.00846262276172638,
0.07526722550392151,
-0.002782739931717515,
0.037079621106386185,
0.00996856763958931,
0.0018208494875580072,
-0.02332785725593567,
0.004927166737616062,
0.035747770220041275,
-0.04759298637509346,
0.0... |
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, MLS Construction, LLC, appeals from the judgment of the trial court concluding that the defendant breached the contract between the defendant and the plaintiff, MD Drilling & Blasting, Inc., and awarding damages, interest and attorney's fees. On appeal, the defendant claims that the... | [
-0.0063066640868783,
-0.03322112560272217,
-0.03181988000869751,
-0.009818829596042633,
0.06235157698392868,
-0.004392805974930525,
0.05380633845925331,
0.02629680372774601,
0.011777624487876892,
-0.03556877747178078,
-0.0055371616035699844,
0.0751759260892868,
-0.07081260532140732,
0.0347... |
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Kareem Hedge, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a), possession of narcotics with the intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-27... | [
-0.008577080443501472,
-0.03643777221441269,
-0.019156934693455696,
-0.025617919862270355,
0.06209282577037811,
0.006615151185542345,
0.02822652831673622,
0.009747952222824097,
0.010327036492526531,
-0.03172111138701439,
0.01811704784631729,
0.05627744272351265,
-0.06468160450458527,
0.033... |
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The plaintiff, James R. Welsch, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Michael Groat, in an action for breach of a lease. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the court properly found that the leased premises were rendered uninhabitable by the plaint... | [
0.034290384501218796,
-0.034341126680374146,
-0.01961282081902027,
-0.01100003719329834,
0.06033289059996605,
0.013570407405495644,
0.07726973295211792,
0.021708553656935692,
0.001573986024595797,
-0.04082460701465607,
-0.012920073233544827,
0.009553452953696251,
-0.05168318748474121,
0.03... |
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. | [
-0.017263848334550858,
-0.025178885087370872,
0.023509109392762184,
-0.04405631124973297,
-0.011512678116559982,
0.007265917025506496,
0.02031796984374523,
0.02513701282441616,
-0.05413757637143135,
-0.03320746496319771,
0.0046457564458251,
0.038345251232385635,
-0.04957141727209091,
0.029... |
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant, Billy Jackson, who was convicted after a jury trial on four of the five counts against him. He was charged in a substitute information with two counts of attempt to commit murder, both in violation of General Statutes § 53a-49 and 53a-54a (a), one count of assau... | [
-0.01721831224858761,
-0.022610222920775414,
-0.038914114236831665,
-0.03972334414720535,
0.027157997712492943,
0.012280398048460484,
0.09545432776212692,
-0.0027400595135986805,
-0.004048951435834169,
-0.01624733954668045,
0.021621868014335632,
0.03309594467282295,
-0.0456952266395092,
0.... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Edward S. O'Briskie, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the jury verdict in favor of the defendant, John J. Berry, in a negligence action arising out of a motor vehicle accident. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion... | [
-0.00526046147570014,
-0.018926940858364105,
0.0000074367167144373525,
-0.006970963440835476,
0.027618108317255974,
0.009314958937466145,
0.07447099685668945,
0.05249878764152527,
-0.020915988832712173,
-0.050113946199417114,
-0.004186887294054031,
0.004597410559654236,
-0.05404858663678169,... |
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this appeal following a jury trial, the defendant, Steven Sewell, challenges the denial of two motions for a mistrial, claiming that the state's failure to disclose two witnesses in accordance with our rules of practice deprived him of a fair trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the tr... | [
0.018249990418553352,
-0.00633761752396822,
-0.07044221460819244,
-0.006562017370015383,
0.04649447277188301,
0.0335688591003418,
0.08469496667385101,
-0.010804804041981697,
-0.013057527132332325,
-0.015764979645609856,
0.04293377324938774,
0.028409291058778763,
-0.08082322776317596,
0.017... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Alex Ortiz, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his conditional plea of nolo contendere to one count each of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and possession of a contr... | [
-0.025135841220617294,
-0.018093597143888474,
-0.016529835760593414,
0.022069068625569344,
0.05943106859922409,
-0.007402691524475813,
0.03641437739133835,
0.017435787245631218,
0.006736950948834419,
-0.02971908636391163,
-0.0064304242841899395,
0.03431880101561546,
-0.06030148267745972,
0... |
Opinion
PETERS, J.
A physician may be held responsible for an unfortunate medical outcome either for failure to comply with the prevailing professional standard of medical care or for failure to obtain informed consent. See Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C., 254 Conn. 131, 757 A.2d 516 (2000). This appe... | [
-0.010325628332793713,
-0.035302914679050446,
-0.041840724647045135,
-0.037506066262722015,
0.04270598664879799,
0.02582918107509613,
0.06924640387296677,
0.026761693879961967,
-0.009457547217607498,
-0.04099053144454956,
0.0008273175917565823,
0.04906371608376503,
-0.05759171023964882,
0.... |
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, O. James Purnell III, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to the plaintiff, Cheryl Purnell, and distributing the parties' property. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) valued the plaintiffs pension, (2) concluded that the pl... | [
-0.015393208712339401,
-0.03170730173587799,
-0.009750958532094955,
0.014178142882883549,
0.05507076531648636,
0.03202524408698082,
0.030086928978562355,
-0.004302847199141979,
-0.007113057654350996,
-0.024058813229203224,
0.005833597853779793,
0.025115154683589935,
-0.051617302000522614,
... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This case comes before us for a second time. The defendants, John A. Seidel and Fred R. Seidel, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Chester Lisiewski. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly found that the plaintiff proved his claim of a... | [
-0.00019065091328229755,
-0.017640555277466774,
-0.028172258287668228,
-0.03262592852115631,
0.062165517359972,
0.010186590254306793,
0.05269017815589905,
0.01658548414707184,
0.03410574793815613,
-0.047578465193510056,
0.020383939146995544,
0.0019489722326397896,
-0.04619157686829567,
0.0... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Richard J. Janulawicz, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered after the trial court accepted his conditional plea of nolo contendere to two counts of criminal possession of a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217 (a) (1), two counts of carrying a dangerous weap... | [
-0.04635981470346451,
-0.020295806229114532,
-0.04097049683332443,
-0.01733378693461418,
0.037024401128292084,
0.026780761778354645,
0.07075463980436325,
-0.02111252397298813,
0.0036653648130595684,
-0.021810490638017654,
-0.009874947369098663,
0.046133410185575485,
-0.046881720423698425,
... |
Opinion
WEST, J.
In this marital dissolution matter, the defendant, William F. Russell, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court issuing certain orders sought by the plaintiff, Burgess Russell, in her postjudgment motions for contempt. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly ordered him to pa... | [
-0.03230459243059158,
-0.014399864710867405,
-0.03076719306409359,
-0.030979031696915627,
0.06400054693222046,
0.011180168017745018,
0.06662207096815109,
-0.00030181961483322084,
0.017221501097083092,
-0.02333276905119419,
-0.006800831761211157,
0.04888457432389259,
-0.060098689049482346,
... |
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Floyd A. Windley, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) and failure to obey a traffic control signal in violation of Genera... | [
0.006187505554407835,
-0.0018040394643321633,
-0.0006310994504019618,
-0.011106650345027447,
0.05274198204278946,
-0.001317838323302567,
0.06795970350503922,
0.03969775512814522,
-0.008377548307180405,
-0.04471676051616669,
0.040629975497722626,
0.06117447465658188,
-0.05080519989132881,
0... |
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The acquittee, Joel C. Kelly, challenges the order of the trial court committing him to the jurisdiction of the psychiatric security review board (board) for a period not to exceed eight years. He seeks plain error review of his unpreserved claim that in ordering commitment pursuant to General Sta... | [
-0.037168700248003006,
-0.01817135326564312,
-0.03194174915552139,
0.011139312759041786,
0.04254494607448578,
-0.007908807136118412,
0.07279080897569656,
0.0017187338089570403,
-0.026162439957261086,
-0.019957873970270157,
-0.001954206731170416,
0.05067320540547371,
-0.06388300657272339,
0... |
Opinion
PETERS, J.
An appeal from a Probate Court to the Superior Court requires a showing of aggrievement. General Statutes § 45U-186. The narrow issue in this probate appeal is whether the status of being an heir is, without additional facts, sufficient to establish aggrievement. The broader issue is whether, if that... | [
-0.034912511706352234,
-0.04904934763908386,
0.012489455752074718,
-0.0048400769010186195,
0.04215884581208229,
0.0049516321159899235,
0.03304891660809517,
0.011370931752026081,
0.0037910069804638624,
-0.04626457393169403,
-0.007907562889158726,
0.04739644005894661,
-0.05790923163294792,
0... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This criminal appeal returns to this court on remand from our Supreme Court; State v. Bermudez, 274 Conn. 581, 876 A.2d 1162 (2005); for resolution of the remaining claims of the defendant, Noel Bermudez. The defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of three counts of manslaughter in the fi... | [
-0.02957349456846714,
-0.03678928315639496,
-0.02009722590446472,
0.0019715488888323307,
0.04202330484986305,
-0.012230262160301208,
0.053780678659677505,
0.038634855300188065,
-0.0005534298252314329,
-0.05652676522731781,
0.02762400172650814,
0.022043203935027122,
-0.06361277401447296,
0.... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Firehouse Associates, LLC, appeals from the trial court's judgment rendered in accordance with a report by an attorney trial referee (referee) in a dispute with the plaintiff, Janet A. living, over a claimed right-of-way. The defendant claims that the court (1) lacked personal juris... | [
-0.0020442535169422626,
-0.039145682007074356,
-0.027437515556812286,
-0.04378454014658928,
0.07678016275167465,
-0.0109581733122468,
0.06361379474401474,
0.023693250492215157,
0.002419673139229417,
-0.04038883000612259,
-0.01915613003075123,
0.018693871796131134,
-0.06924108415842056,
0.0... |
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. | [
-0.017263848334550858,
-0.025178885087370872,
0.023509109392762184,
-0.04405631124973297,
-0.011512678116559982,
0.007265917025506496,
0.02031796984374523,
0.02513701282441616,
-0.05413757637143135,
-0.03320746496319771,
0.0046457564458251,
0.038345251232385635,
-0.04957141727209091,
0.029... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Brian Dell, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a trial to the court, of one count of larceny in the first degree by embezzlement in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (2). The defendant claims that the evidence did not support the court's finding that ... | [
-0.01487052533775568,
-0.05771967023611069,
-0.023678041994571686,
0.010168558917939663,
0.02938806265592575,
-0.026066109538078308,
0.014453059993684292,
0.038295917212963104,
0.0009221759391948581,
-0.04888126999139786,
0.02857976034283638,
0.05180450901389122,
-0.07597989588975906,
0.02... |
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The petitioner, Mark L. Bova, Sr., appeals, following the granting of his petition for certification to appeal, from the habeas court's judgment dismissing his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to... | [
-0.021179260686039925,
-0.015275832265615463,
-0.04656311869621277,
-0.010097155347466469,
0.05277794227004051,
0.00741162896156311,
0.030111320316791534,
-0.00018026679754257202,
0.004879459273070097,
-0.0162555743008852,
0.045947860926389694,
0.04641251266002655,
-0.0625355988740921,
0.0... |
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The defendant, Jose A. Irizarry, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2), threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62 (a) (2) and criminal mischief in the... | [
-0.03075120598077774,
-0.05067930370569229,
-0.031968023627996445,
-0.0032057964708656073,
0.04387457296252251,
0.022197416052222252,
0.06719940155744553,
0.03238995373249054,
-0.013099382631480694,
-0.00125265889801085,
0.008621469140052795,
0.012401077896356583,
-0.07835942506790161,
-0.... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Roy D., appeals from the judgments of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court imposed an unauthorized condition of probation and (2) he did not have notice that failure to admit to his offenses whi... | [
-0.0014306113589555025,
-0.03344784304499626,
-0.011698444373905659,
-0.007079143077135086,
0.042970478534698486,
-0.005343390163034201,
0.05321304500102997,
0.02041354961693287,
-0.007574794348329306,
-0.017234448343515396,
-0.001360231195576489,
0.04042995721101761,
-0.03975975885987282,
... |
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The defendant, Zymol Enterprises, Inc., appeals from the judgment rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Richard Fontana. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied its motion for a remittitur and (2) instructed the jury on the exception to the statute of frauds. W... | [
0.0027033062651753426,
-0.024285411462187767,
-0.03320972993969917,
0.006403426639735699,
0.05413072928786278,
0.0382358655333519,
0.01710575819015503,
0.021954821422696114,
0.016482748091220856,
-0.010930448770523071,
0.004797224421054125,
0.030084364116191864,
-0.07253216952085495,
0.017... |
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The defendant, Edward Singer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and committing him to the custody of the commissioner of correction for the remainder of his sentence. On appeal, he claims that the court (1) improperly found that he had violated the conditions of h... | [
-0.02328813262283802,
-0.026826009154319763,
-0.02257586643099785,
-0.014840698800981045,
0.04316474869847298,
0.024998445063829422,
0.08717239648103714,
0.011565134860575199,
-0.005072267260402441,
-0.034331511706113815,
0.01922711171209812,
0.018039356917142868,
-0.04970928281545639,
0.0... |
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The issue in this appeal by the state is whether a police officer who arrested the driver of a motor vehicle on a charge of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor had a reasonable and articulable suspicion on the basis of facts to justify an investigatory stop. Because the driver was no... | [
-0.0023186320904642344,
-0.005939499940723181,
-0.01650499552488327,
-0.011950544081628323,
0.014761419035494328,
-0.03272666037082672,
0.043954212218523026,
0.009896449744701385,
0.011426624841988087,
-0.07112691551446915,
0.000553301302716136,
0.0563100129365921,
-0.041331030428409576,
0... |
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Sandra A. Dixon, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant law firm, Bromson & Reiner. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that expert testimony was necessary to show (1) t... | [
-0.027684500440955162,
-0.037010978907346725,
0.0001253429363714531,
-0.011694710701704025,
0.06639586389064789,
0.03979288786649704,
0.05318601056933403,
0.000589529168792069,
-0.011277000419795513,
-0.03893905133008957,
0.008635124191641808,
0.014148827642202377,
-0.03681739419698715,
0.... |
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
In this action for breach of contract, the defendants, Roger Higbie and Hyun Higbie, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Michael Forastiere, Michael O'Loughlin and David Popkin. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) found that t... | [
0.00060468033188954,
-0.03750501200556755,
-0.012474743649363518,
0.001822319463826716,
0.03112986497581005,
0.011673892848193645,
0.04997490346431732,
0.02306998521089554,
0.01851171813905239,
-0.07739145308732986,
0.019354108721017838,
0.027101583778858185,
-0.094889335334301,
0.03204308... |
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, Eric Alvarez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136 and larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-124 (a) (2). After a jury trial on a part B informa... | [
-0.007968471385538578,
-0.031940534710884094,
-0.038696687668561935,
-0.016610708087682724,
0.031097114086151123,
0.005834152922034264,
0.05533500388264656,
0.013858954422175884,
0.01798749528825283,
-0.01340243499726057,
0.010946298018097878,
0.06652126461267471,
-0.07430847734212875,
0.0... |
Opinion
WEST, J.
The defendant, Michael Alexander, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a), possession of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (d), possession of narcotic... | [
-0.007187606766819954,
-0.022883238270878792,
-0.019055938348174095,
-0.03176327049732208,
0.07405301928520203,
0.0007879850454628468,
0.051600828766822815,
0.006229451857507229,
-0.0028118889313191175,
-0.021137889474630356,
0.00856233574450016,
0.059673283249139786,
-0.05342581495642662,
... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Norberto Cales, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136, criminal trespass in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-108 and assault in the third degree in violati... | [
-0.04086808115243912,
-0.02894148975610733,
-0.015457488596439362,
0.015253252349793911,
0.030581040307879448,
0.03325570002198219,
0.03996439650654793,
0.018155928701162338,
-0.0034490127582103014,
-0.019521255046129227,
0.03374788165092468,
0.04971928521990776,
-0.04227453097701073,
-0.0... |
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff father, Mirmasood Reza, appeals from the trial court's judgment, dated February 4, 2005, granting the motion filed by the defendant mother, Shekiba Leyasi, to modify custody and support orders entered on October 22, 2003. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly applied... | [
-0.033301569521427155,
-0.016245495527982712,
-0.042453937232494354,
-0.0330897755920887,
0.057790108025074005,
0.022264676168560982,
0.02952895127236843,
0.00259129935875535,
-0.006678563542664051,
-0.05408620089292526,
-0.00017455963825341314,
0.026867326349020004,
-0.03858819603919983,
... |
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff, South Sea Company, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following the granting of the motion filed by the defendant, Global Turbine Component Technologies, LLC, to dismiss the plaintiffs summary process complaint. The defendant contended in its motion that the c... | [
-0.04071040824055672,
-0.027852922677993774,
-0.034441377967596054,
0.000033958098356379196,
0.05586470291018486,
0.004400261677801609,
0.029380621388554573,
0.027415931224822998,
-0.0028854140546172857,
-0.022522522136569023,
-0.03134096413850784,
0.03440757840871811,
-0.04941636323928833,
... |
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, Vertex, Inc., appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendant, the city of Waterbury. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly dismissed, sua sponte, two counts of its complaint just before the trial was to begin, and incorrectly instructed the jury ... | [
0.020337045192718506,
-0.05729517713189125,
-0.0232269074767828,
0.010431787930428982,
0.057016391307115555,
0.022318590432405472,
0.017053375020623207,
0.02905944176018238,
0.013452882878482342,
-0.046848103404045105,
-0.0030012940987944603,
0.04331964626908302,
-0.04925771430134773,
0.04... |
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Manuel Moutinho and J.R.R.C. Associates (J.R.R.C.), appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction their zoning appeal from the decision of the named defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the city of Bridgeport (commissio... | [
-0.03783677518367767,
-0.031590159982442856,
-0.053235653787851334,
0.005521539598703384,
0.05094946548342705,
-0.003057071939110756,
0.04150746762752533,
0.006887825671583414,
0.020638108253479004,
-0.0473957434296608,
-0.013183523900806904,
0.04950771853327751,
-0.07226777821779251,
0.04... |
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The state appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the conviction of the defendant, Trendel Tutson, of attempt to commit murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a and 53a-49, and assault in the first degree in violation of General Stat... | [
-0.00962586048990488,
-0.029694290831685066,
-0.018240418285131454,
0.009401756338775158,
0.04912247508764267,
-0.019429214298725128,
0.056239716708660126,
0.050404567271471024,
0.01750413328409195,
-0.03572577238082886,
0.0546802394092083,
0.04604407027363777,
-0.03324911743402481,
0.0309... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 789 (AC 26204), is denied. | [
-0.01969720423221588,
-0.04591303691267967,
-0.0012944054324179888,
0.018687890842556953,
0.0630735531449318,
0.030206462368369102,
0.03708457946777344,
-0.00963717233389616,
-0.005650899838656187,
-0.025163738057017326,
0.0011600806610658765,
0.04105444625020027,
-0.045622944831848145,
0.... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 97 (AC 26044), is denied. | [
-0.029457900673151016,
-0.053413525223731995,
0.008212685585021973,
0.007783601991832256,
0.061910230666399,
0.022527115419507027,
0.04307626932859421,
-0.009767148643732071,
-0.00019673645147122443,
-0.022510534152388573,
-0.007063583470880985,
0.04729985445737839,
-0.05212622135877609,
0... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 527 (AC 24295), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant's appeal from the judgment revoking his probation as moot?" | [
-0.008341725915670395,
-0.03958926722407341,
-0.03092564269900322,
-0.02476849965751171,
0.06452161818742752,
0.0003127281670458615,
0.05815180018544197,
0.00642430642619729,
-0.016400648280978203,
-0.004266041796654463,
-0.0062737371772527695,
0.06216906011104584,
-0.038571324199438095,
0... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 79 (AC 25913), is granted, limited to the following issue:
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17651.
John W. Lemega and Aubrey E. Ruta, in support of the petition.
William J. Melley III, in opposition.
Decided April 12, 2006... | [
-0.012455838732421398,
-0.027711881324648857,
0.019342517480254173,
-0.001656879554502666,
0.06632322818040848,
0.03936949744820595,
0.029649879783391953,
-0.003215388860553503,
-0.00953733827918768,
-0.009506424888968468,
0.01636054925620556,
0.06932199001312256,
-0.046747807413339615,
0.... |
The petitioner Edward Vines' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 288 (AC 24789), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. | [
0.016183076426386833,
-0.051542364060878754,
0.00007522071246057749,
0.020083671435713768,
0.07512441277503967,
0.0014596147229894996,
0.03651224821805954,
0.004061893559992313,
0.007499453611671925,
-0.03532702848315239,
-0.013705228455364704,
0.06057330593466759,
-0.037776343524456024,
0... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This case demonstrates the tension between the traditional and time-honored power of the people to legislate through referendum and the mandate requiring elected representatives to discharge their duties in accordance with the law. In this matter, the plaintiff, Linda Palermo, appeals from the judgme... | [
-0.0009252299787476659,
-0.06311694532632828,
-0.01222386583685875,
-0.005832090973854065,
0.01143692061305046,
-0.00811217911541462,
0.0052575357258319855,
0.015709390863776207,
-0.02579822950065136,
-0.04840080067515373,
0.006673183757811785,
0.032335810363292694,
-0.06970247626304626,
0... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Michael E. Brown, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1), unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95, threatening in the second ... | [
-0.015381799079477787,
-0.02586785890161991,
-0.029314428567886353,
-0.030718382447957993,
0.006738907657563686,
0.002755999332293868,
0.0744902640581131,
0.005733597557991743,
-0.03832736611366272,
-0.012144840322434902,
-0.0035456065088510513,
0.039368707686662674,
-0.05245187133550644,
... |
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, William P. Slade, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of carrying a pistol or revolver without a permit in violation of General Statutes § 29-35 (a), possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 29-38 (a), criminal pos... | [
-0.01883714832365513,
-0.005059441085904837,
-0.05417950451374054,
0.021115662530064583,
0.03382721170783043,
0.001395830768160522,
0.05674293264746666,
0.0051046814769506454,
-0.008577107451856136,
-0.01672094315290451,
0.02269570901989937,
0.05239541083574295,
-0.052661485970020294,
0.03... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Mark S. Urich, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendant, Richard Fish, on the defendant's counterclaim. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly awarded the defendant (1) punitive damages and attorney's fees un... | [
-0.054738227277994156,
-0.0714149996638298,
-0.007593538146466017,
0.005802261643111706,
0.04021690785884857,
0.013848700560629368,
0.005713964346796274,
0.03740900754928589,
0.01948639005422592,
-0.038388706743717194,
0.019862275570631027,
0.0398840568959713,
-0.04577858746051788,
0.01391... |
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Jane Saccu, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court dismissing her appeal from an order of the Probate Court for the district of Orange. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly upheld the Probate Court's order (1) granting the motion filed by the defendant... | [
-0.027326056733727455,
-0.06014887988567352,
-0.023972542956471443,
0.005037723109126091,
0.08892622590065002,
0.03524089977145195,
0.021601496264338493,
0.02856236882507801,
0.013505327515304089,
-0.05657578259706497,
0.001157259801402688,
0.01831505075097084,
-0.07145541906356812,
0.0334... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, Suzanne Mersereau Searles, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, dismissing her administrative appeal from the decisions of the defendant, the department of social services, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The only issue on appeal is whether the court lacked subject m... | [
-0.02920013666152954,
-0.05197683721780777,
-0.028288761153817177,
-0.002509867772459984,
0.028343887999653816,
0.02019987441599369,
0.014382249675691128,
0.005969271529465914,
-0.018567407503724098,
-0.03422173485159874,
0.007742864079773426,
0.026174023747444153,
-0.023854225873947144,
0... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner, Alonzo Jackson, appeals following the habeas court's denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal.
The petitioner was convicted, following a jury trial, of robbery in the first deg... | [
-0.017059726640582085,
-0.024826345965266228,
-0.051985252648591995,
-0.0008953564101830125,
0.04485250636935234,
0.017459135502576828,
0.041159942746162415,
-0.03130510821938515,
-0.004731360822916031,
-0.01870794966816902,
0.005664120893925428,
0.04192451387643814,
-0.0737716481089592,
0... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Vincent Juliano (Vincent) appeals from the judgments rendered in two actions that were consolidated and tried to the court. He appeals from the judgments as a plaintiff in one action and as a defendant in the other. In the first action, instituted in October, 2003, Vincent brought a convoluted pro s... | [
-0.01508166640996933,
-0.013619808480143547,
-0.006487087346613407,
-0.020491614937782288,
0.023646922782063484,
0.03310858830809593,
0.037123434245586395,
-0.006273433566093445,
-0.0056938910856842995,
-0.02875833585858345,
0.010396325960755348,
0.0371122770011425,
-0.07107071578502655,
0... |
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Concern about the trustworthiness of confessions of criminal misconduct has led to the enunciation of the corpus delicti rule, pursuant to which a criminal conviction cannot be based only on an uncorroborated extrajudicial confession of guilt. State v. Far-num, 275 Conn. 26, 33, 878 A.2d 1095 (2005).... | [
-0.036879297345876694,
-0.0371435321867466,
-0.026728104799985886,
-0.028559651225805283,
0.06209736689925194,
0.004155301954597235,
0.058305833488702774,
0.02043773978948593,
-0.0013064274098724127,
-0.02527131699025631,
-0.01414081547409296,
0.031840186566114426,
-0.056379180401563644,
-... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Rental Management, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Rent-A-PC, Inc. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the basis of unjust enrichment and (2) concluded that the defend... | [
-0.006822424940764904,
-0.03361840546131134,
-0.03511178866028786,
0.018959980458021164,
0.08331338316202164,
0.013669129461050034,
0.028404250741004944,
0.023286880925297737,
0.007024658378213644,
-0.0376674048602581,
-0.021174360066652298,
0.07511618733406067,
-0.05947738513350487,
0.041... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiff, Christopher Kennedy, appeals pro se from the denial of his application for a restraining order against the defendant, Leanna Put-man, made pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-15. The plaintiff claims that the trial court's decision was contrary to the evidence presented at the hearin... | [
-0.032100193202495575,
-0.03003053180873394,
-0.025995653122663498,
0.01758171245455742,
0.04458417743444443,
0.018656086176633835,
0.04806778207421303,
-0.017048310488462448,
-0.026762260124087334,
-0.03843521326780319,
-0.009701550006866455,
0.008707283064723015,
-0.04995441809296608,
0.... |
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This criminal appeal involves an elderly man who sustained severe bodily injuries in his home. Alleging that the victim's injuries resulted from an altercation with his son, the state charged the son with assault and unlawful restraint. The son claimed, however, that the victim's injuries resulted fr... | [
-0.039796557277441025,
-0.02647542580962181,
-0.03344632685184479,
-0.03195095434784889,
0.03884303569793701,
0.004213039297610521,
0.05078659951686859,
-0.011180794797837734,
-0.015889592468738556,
-0.045647263526916504,
-0.006150451488792896,
0.018154561519622803,
-0.0567062608897686,
0.... |
Opinion
FOTI, J.
On December 8, 1996, John Fred Dean was shot and killed inside a Bridgeport nightclub known as the Factory. The state charged the defendant, Michael A. Holbrook, with Dean's murder. In 2003, the defendant's first jury trial ended in a mistrial. After a second trial, in 2004, the jury found the defendan... | [
-0.005849928129464388,
-0.0014729526592418551,
-0.057589806616306305,
-0.007910680025815964,
0.05341855436563492,
0.012182682752609253,
0.06102749705314636,
0.0008268949459306896,
-0.02469426766037941,
-0.004343849606812,
0.01956271566450596,
-0.0027210372500121593,
-0.07178941369056702,
0... |
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, William Aley, appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to the plaintiff, Susan Aley. He claims that the trial court (1) improperly proceeded to judgment in his absence, without adequate notice to him or an opportunity to be heard, (2) lacked jurisdiction to order a certain h... | [
-0.038248684257268906,
-0.03701915964484215,
-0.007847209461033344,
-0.02199750393629074,
0.05434354022145271,
0.028256919234991074,
0.0173117034137249,
0.003143113339319825,
-0.001987760653719306,
-0.02955751121044159,
0.015417413786053658,
0.04120797663927078,
-0.05512373894453049,
0.055... |
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The petitioner, Jermaine Young, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He had been sentenced to a total effective term of fifty years incarceration after the jury found him guilty of the crimes of murder and conspiracy to commit murder in ... | [
0.0030797708313912153,
-0.014977661892771721,
-0.05517472326755524,
-0.0339326485991478,
0.044338397681713104,
0.012728860601782799,
0.0326506644487381,
-0.02365359291434288,
-0.006837369408458471,
-0.025565652176737785,
0.012159120291471481,
0.020422449335455894,
-0.07302138954401016,
0.0... |
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to R and N, her two minor children. On appeal, she claims that the court (1) improperly concluded that R sustained a serious bodily injury under General Statutes § 17a-112 (j) (3) (F) and ... | [
-0.01921355351805687,
-0.015490402467548847,
-0.01040965411812067,
-0.028563257306814194,
0.010369955562055111,
0.019914567470550537,
0.04728057608008385,
0.015724128112196922,
0.0016339010326191783,
-0.036646705120801926,
0.030507389456033707,
0.05728144571185112,
-0.023718057200312614,
0... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Kenneth Williams, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-135. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied (1) his motion for a mistrial, which was made on ... | [
-0.03628631681203842,
-0.02972574532032013,
-0.03499271720647812,
-0.003063856391236186,
0.04958847910165787,
0.03238344565033913,
0.06697742640972137,
0.023913614451885223,
-0.011933893896639347,
-0.03409938886761665,
0.01173100434243679,
0.011305264197289944,
-0.06370797753334045,
0.0188... |
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Arthur D. Machado, an attorney, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the reprimand issued to him by the defendant, the statewide grievance committee. The defendant affirmed the decision of its reviewing committee, reprimanding the plaintiff for viol... | [
-0.05682108551263809,
-0.03384322673082352,
-0.007021055556833744,
0.003941616043448448,
0.0491362027823925,
0.02767997421324253,
0.04651213809847832,
0.017921309918165207,
-0.021034790202975273,
-0.017243115231394768,
-0.01700417697429657,
0.050216276198625565,
-0.04319963604211807,
0.038... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant Cromwell Development Associates (Cromwell Associates) and certain of its defendant partners appeal from the deficiency judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Anthony R. Ferrigno, trustee, in the amount of $978,993.90. The plaintiff has filed a cross appeal. On... | [
-0.021792681887745857,
-0.048781249672174454,
-0.008698404766619205,
-0.021737568080425262,
0.05353680998086929,
0.0416778028011322,
0.04243740066885948,
0.024098433554172516,
-0.0027689682319760323,
-0.026018906384706497,
0.005409062374383211,
0.03295236453413963,
-0.035401854664087296,
0... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court ordering the opening and setting aside of the decrees of the Probate Court for the district of Eastford, which had admitted and probated a will of Mamie Nahibowitz that devised her property to the defendants. On appeal, the defendants claim t... | [
-0.012295980006456375,
-0.031299788504838943,
-0.02811799943447113,
-0.016753915697336197,
0.061534516513347626,
0.0010565975680947304,
0.034405194222927094,
0.0017257204744964838,
0.006696698721498251,
-0.05048642307519913,
0.002958170138299465,
0.058549705892801285,
-0.0648391842842102,
... |
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Michael J. Marsala, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of harassment in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-183 (a) (3). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) his conviction on four counts of harassment in the ... | [
-0.05090891942381859,
-0.01145333331078291,
-0.0053643458522856236,
-0.020753346383571625,
0.0408155657351017,
0.0031452758703380823,
0.053286727517843246,
0.005994051229208708,
-0.03974009305238724,
-0.017204727977514267,
0.015376395545899868,
0.03176522254943848,
-0.04746092110872269,
-0... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant L.G. DeFelice, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, The resa Gurguis, Gamal Gurguis and Meena Gurguis. The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the defendant had a duty to warn th... | [
0.014500061050057411,
-0.039581604301929474,
-0.009296444244682789,
0.006102457642555237,
0.06343758851289749,
0.014580066315829754,
0.06629479676485062,
0.04961167275905609,
0.0017277918523177505,
-0.04899369925260544,
0.03377646207809448,
0.06115778163075447,
-0.04526475444436073,
0.0518... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Larry Powell, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a) and assault of public safety personnel in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167c (a) (l). On appeal, the defendant claims t... | [
-0.023870501667261124,
-0.015551285818219185,
-0.03492932766675949,
-0.0017160357674583793,
0.05365739017724991,
0.002049286151304841,
0.015469980426132679,
0.024731403216719627,
-0.020400503650307655,
-0.03671083599328995,
-0.0004314571269787848,
0.03275645524263382,
-0.06787549704313278,
... |
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, the city of Milford, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its application to modify and correct the arbitration award and confirming the award of $136,787.50 in favor of the defendant, Coppola Construction Company, Inc. The plaintiff claims that the court should have mod... | [
-0.019493872299790382,
-0.025462836027145386,
-0.03665362298488617,
-0.03221605345606804,
0.05770616605877876,
0.00470838975161314,
0.023505954071879387,
0.02136762998998165,
0.016010388731956482,
-0.058367304503917694,
-0.038044121116399765,
0.06561435014009476,
-0.05192670598626137,
0.04... |
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The defendant, Madalena Silva, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a. On appeal, she claims that the state did not present sufficient evidence to support her conviction and the t... | [
0.0045411246828734875,
-0.03037256747484207,
-0.024322807788848877,
-0.019155874848365784,
0.03585630655288696,
-0.001326758530922234,
0.04885774105787277,
-0.0026811871211975813,
-0.009580344893038273,
-0.04743250459432602,
0.036993928253650665,
0.0575505755841732,
-0.0520593598484993,
0.... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Gregory Gaymon, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation. The defendant claims that (1) the court improperly interpreted a special condition of his probation, (2) he did not have fair notice of the conduct proscribed by a special condition of his probation, a... | [
-0.02441944181919098,
-0.026132524013519287,
-0.02434861846268177,
-0.017393702641129494,
0.03585034981369972,
0.026413923129439354,
0.06956548243761063,
-0.004951527342200279,
0.0010996288619935513,
-0.03015068918466568,
0.0008842388051562011,
0.03088698349893093,
-0.04483327269554138,
0.... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner, Jancis L. Fuller, appeals following the habeas court's denial of her petition for certification to appeal from the judgment dismissing her amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal.
The defendant was convicted of two counts of attempt to commit assault in th... | [
-0.02426711469888687,
-0.021867386996746063,
-0.05676324665546417,
-0.04155283421278,
0.04615429788827896,
0.034530192613601685,
0.03921590745449066,
-0.031127842143177986,
-0.008493772707879543,
-0.020796895027160645,
0.0046407007612288,
0.04097030311822891,
-0.0573158785700798,
0.0631467... |
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, William Loughlin, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to the plaintiff, Sharon Loughlin, and claims that certain of the court's financial orders were improper. He argues that the court improperly (1) relied on the length of the parties' entire r... | [
-0.02921193465590477,
-0.008157373405992985,
0.013216014951467514,
-0.015004375949501991,
0.06302765756845474,
0.035433538258075714,
0.018510812893509865,
0.00896244402974844,
-0.015323697589337826,
0.0050577097572386265,
0.006518809124827385,
0.04217887297272682,
-0.04093427211046219,
0.0... |
Opinion
WEST, J.
The defendants, D. W. Fish Realty Company (D. W. Fish) and JoAnn Marozzi, appeal from the judg ment of the trial court rendered following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Christine Heller and Richard Heller. The plaintiffs also appeal, challenging the court's denial of their motion for attorn... | [
-0.00668382178992033,
-0.022403037175536156,
-0.008282318711280823,
0.001685375114902854,
0.08630107343196869,
0.03522007167339325,
0.03271981701254845,
0.020649729296565056,
0.03429269790649414,
-0.04599974676966667,
0.02053777687251568,
0.04338560253381729,
-0.059869445860385895,
0.04572... |
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
This appeal presents a question of statutory interpretation of General Statutes § 45a-441, our testamentary antilapse statute. The appellant, Kathleen Smaldone, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court on appeal from the Probate Court, which found the statute inoperative in the present case... | [
0.0015175887383520603,
-0.04315796121954918,
-0.017433809116482735,
-0.03122052550315857,
0.07037803530693054,
-0.014536379836499691,
0.03263077884912491,
-0.0008115254458971322,
-0.008269714191555977,
-0.05937310680747032,
0.012176361866295338,
0.024128206074237823,
-0.03405970707535744,
... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 547 (AC 26706), is denied. | [
-0.030433135107159615,
-0.0525725819170475,
0.007300684694200754,
0.01188613660633564,
0.05514359846711159,
0.03085339441895485,
0.04571706801652908,
-0.018613219261169434,
-0.0033202467020601034,
-0.016354333609342575,
0.0010127214482054114,
0.0503818579018116,
-0.03937229514122009,
0.071... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.