text stringlengths 7 603k | embeddings listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 297 (AC 26651), is denied.
Glenn W. Falk, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided April 25, 2006 | [
-0.016704345121979713,
-0.03820688650012016,
-0.019424602389335632,
0.008058101870119572,
0.04226388782262802,
0.025145182386040688,
0.036572810262441635,
-0.01431093830615282,
-0.0055824038572609425,
-0.011209612712264061,
0.012180938385426998,
0.06870122998952866,
-0.04568571224808693,
0... |
The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 906 (AC 25379), is denied. | [
-0.025257734581828117,
-0.031608834862709045,
-0.02251935750246048,
0.010805301368236542,
0.058381419628858566,
0.02273266762495041,
0.03559604287147522,
-0.024683650583028793,
-0.02836744487285614,
-0.027806159108877182,
-0.004350040107965469,
0.04660632833838463,
-0.05208136886358261,
0.... |
The petition by the defendant Ortansa Michaelesco for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 26136) is denied. | [
-0.04447019472718239,
-0.05324343219399452,
0.024015028029680252,
0.05615203082561493,
0.06602010130882263,
0.030270125716924667,
0.03592303767800331,
-0.022176064550876617,
-0.028953980654478073,
-0.011349811218678951,
-0.005899670999497175,
0.025676658377051353,
-0.032553136348724365,
0.... |
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly dismissed as moot the appeal of the defendants, Valley View Associates and Kings Highway Associates, from the trial court's judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff, RAL Management, Inc. More specifically, t... | [
-0.015658294782042503,
-0.021945875138044357,
0.029840663075447083,
-0.025053896009922028,
0.06333256512880325,
0.011754387989640236,
0.03384988754987717,
-0.0031408185604959726,
-0.010570194572210312,
-0.016112281009554863,
-0.004791011102497578,
0.08417955040931702,
-0.04679003357887268,
... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 392 (AC 25189), is denied. | [
-0.03182908892631531,
-0.0645373985171318,
-0.012197752483189106,
0.018815455958247185,
0.05631958320736885,
0.01481393352150917,
0.02080244943499565,
-0.0022032565902918577,
-0.0038423400837928057,
-0.010267716832458973,
-0.0002765525132417679,
0.04395030811429024,
-0.05551055818796158,
0... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 812 (AC 25609), is denied. | [
-0.035233598202466965,
-0.047418203204870224,
-0.010837688110768795,
0.020998144522309303,
0.07642412930727005,
0.023246800526976585,
0.02424522303044796,
-0.005397421773523092,
-0.0017916602082550526,
-0.016314417123794556,
0.010156607255339622,
0.03666377812623978,
-0.05729862302541733,
... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 617 (AC 25390), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's conclusion that the defendant was a keeper of the dog?
"2. Did ... | [
-0.008489896543323994,
-0.049246419221162796,
-0.008231764659285545,
0.013627338223159313,
0.08442461490631104,
0.020051538944244385,
0.06465490162372589,
-0.009852939285337925,
0.014211241155862808,
0.00055773212807253,
0.02166743390262127,
0.05394703522324562,
-0.02993786893785,
0.013193... |
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a voluntary arbitration panel is bound to apply the doctrine of claim preclusion to a second arbitration claim involving the interpretation of the same provision of a contract between the same parties. The defendant, Doctor's Associates, Inc., appeals fro... | [
-0.01788231171667576,
-0.011488649062812328,
-0.023894712328910828,
-0.004073315765708685,
0.036183495074510574,
-0.002627826761454344,
0.029102828353643417,
0.0058281333185732365,
0.02466960810124874,
-0.03356632590293884,
-0.0226454921066761,
0.048817504197359085,
-0.04490802437067032,
0... |
The petitioner Ben Jenkins' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 902 (AC 25911), is denied. | [
-0.026243336498737335,
-0.05183479189872742,
-0.011811693198978901,
0.0045844390988349915,
0.060844551771879196,
0.026563918218016624,
0.05865596979856491,
0.008415665477514267,
-0.01075954083353281,
-0.0460149422287941,
0.0037315930239856243,
0.042507681995630264,
-0.05731922388076782,
0.... |
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 667 (AC 25313), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the defendant's conviction of sexual assault in the third degree under General Statutes § 53a-72a (a... | [
-0.04984300956130028,
-0.028094829991459846,
-0.010170520283281803,
-0.029819071292877197,
0.0228817667812109,
0.00035392434801906347,
0.055532414466142654,
0.0005690098623745143,
0.0015749105950817466,
0.00035732879769057035,
0.015144784934818745,
0.03346620127558708,
-0.039846159517765045,... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 26762) is denied. | [
-0.02633567713201046,
-0.056167494505643845,
-0.016671402379870415,
0.0318351574242115,
0.054618243128061295,
0.02385617420077324,
0.0518670491874218,
-0.042396388947963715,
-0.010611861012876034,
-0.0034608629066497087,
0.013652611523866653,
0.010850226506590843,
-0.036192018538713455,
0.... |
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiff, Flora Smith, against the defendants, 200 Greenwich Acquisition, LLC (Greenwich Acquisition), 19 West Elm Street Associates, LLC (19 West Elm Street), the town of Greenwich (town), and Ronald R. Passerelli, Jr., in connection with injuri... | [
-0.024995921179652214,
-0.015560106374323368,
-0.012389425188302994,
-0.02486349269747734,
0.08320459723472595,
0.00831684097647667,
0.0339558869600296,
0.04007553681731224,
0.013374470174312592,
-0.04367268085479736,
-0.022420359775424004,
0.01892409473657608,
-0.04357628896832466,
0.0322... |
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether a new home construction contract that fails to comply with the registration, disclosure and contract language provisions of the New Home Construction Contractors Act, General Statutes § 20-417a et seq., is unenforceable. The defendants, Steven P. Cordovano an... | [
0.023676583543419838,
-0.028302157297730446,
-0.018841587007045746,
-0.04214642196893692,
0.060671404004096985,
-0.01936543919146061,
0.06168980896472931,
0.024794794619083405,
0.008680869825184345,
-0.036780599504709244,
-0.0070606074295938015,
0.044028881937265396,
-0.07121211290359497,
... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 747 (AC 25828), is denied. | [
-0.01751943677663803,
-0.03887030854821205,
0.0010134628973901272,
0.00978990737348795,
0.051588013768196106,
0.01671111397445202,
0.03480461984872818,
-0.01907602697610855,
-0.006584751885384321,
-0.004163627978414297,
0.007649962790310383,
0.034097153693437576,
-0.05114535242319107,
0.05... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 62 (AC 26414), is denied. | [
-0.024346299469470978,
-0.03070591762661934,
-0.02220439724624157,
0.031522877514362335,
0.05594271421432495,
0.014196288771927357,
0.05149228870868683,
-0.029463082551956177,
0.013961607590317726,
-0.012494552880525589,
-0.004958291072398424,
0.05196039751172066,
-0.05822492018342018,
0.0... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 139 (AC 25959), is denied. | [
-0.03794725611805916,
-0.06143942102789879,
-0.012537728995084763,
0.019750872626900673,
0.05746763199567795,
0.015856442973017693,
0.04346749559044838,
-0.01961573027074337,
0.006224835757166147,
-0.022947147488594055,
0.0024464428424835205,
0.0478743351995945,
-0.05265025794506073,
0.072... |
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 799 (AC 26235), is denied. | [
-0.0091726528480649,
-0.05370313674211502,
-0.01641903631389141,
0.019440799951553345,
0.0784345269203186,
0.02010476589202881,
0.045248039066791534,
-0.010266332887113094,
-0.002899182727560401,
-0.0387168750166893,
0.012757779099047184,
0.060029368847608566,
-0.04200740158557892,
0.07700... |
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The issue in this appeal is the validity of an automobile insurance policy's exclusion from uninsured motorist coverage for government owned vehicles when the insurance carrier that issued the government's policy is insolvent. The substitute plaintiff, the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (as... | [
-0.03478860482573509,
-0.055302418768405914,
-0.011309382505714893,
0.013411199674010277,
0.046451687812805176,
-0.0033318367786705494,
0.006543105933815241,
-0.005849530454725027,
-0.007366127334535122,
-0.022759223356842995,
0.009287172928452492,
0.08303501456975937,
-0.0556112565100193,
... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 26200) is denied. | [
-0.019190896302461624,
-0.05102149769663811,
-0.009615730494260788,
0.03786935657262802,
0.039246875792741776,
0.03055163100361824,
0.055084437131881714,
-0.038820378482341766,
0.02110174298286438,
-0.025188053026795387,
0.012219766154885292,
0.014961590990424156,
-0.031183458864688873,
0.... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 325 (AC 24666), is denied.
Jennifer Vickery, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided June 7, 2006 | [
-0.01985965669155121,
-0.04814452305436134,
-0.013260186649858952,
0.0039239972829818726,
0.04700909182429314,
0.030556146055459976,
0.03904291242361069,
-0.012454528361558914,
-0.012681908905506134,
-0.007785257883369923,
0.005604292266070843,
0.0573696494102478,
-0.04353201761841774,
0.0... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 72 (AC 25415), is denied. | [
-0.02146538533270359,
-0.04917451739311218,
-0.030643368139863014,
0.014249363914132118,
0.06375111639499664,
0.021276921033859253,
0.049660176038742065,
-0.008886516094207764,
0.01827670820057392,
-0.007813429459929466,
-0.011335349641740322,
0.06600489467382431,
-0.05064424127340317,
0.0... |
Opinion
KATZ, J.
Two of the defendants in this foreclosure action, Willard L. Hargrove and Alaina Hargrove (defen dants), appeal from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. The defendants contend that the trial court impr... | [
-0.023674700409173965,
-0.03320580720901489,
-0.001073129242286086,
-0.020062308758497238,
0.06455735117197037,
0.008759613148868084,
0.018212774768471718,
0.0020415664184838533,
0.0038240794092416763,
-0.03442203253507614,
-0.011632655747234821,
0.062141042202711105,
-0.07413191348314285,
... |
The petitioner Gary Klinger's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 579 (AC 25978), is denied. | [
-0.02387198992073536,
-0.058907248079776764,
0.020439039915800095,
0.02672591060400009,
0.07566102594137192,
0.005551476031541824,
0.03637256845831871,
-0.00004449583502719179,
-0.004176018759608269,
-0.03296278417110443,
0.009530053474009037,
0.048306021839380264,
-0.03599032014608383,
0.... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 510 (AC 26289), is denied.
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. | [
-0.020377343520522118,
-0.056620217859745026,
-0.015634292736649513,
0.02518906258046627,
0.06695763021707535,
0.004966479726135731,
0.02947329357266426,
-0.0002266115916427225,
0.001464410568587482,
-0.020689694210886955,
-0.01356141921132803,
0.051131900399923325,
-0.03785077482461929,
0... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 582 (AC 25509), is denied.
Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided April 7, 2006 | [
-0.01966889388859272,
-0.04311574622988701,
-0.0031497282907366753,
0.002550669014453888,
0.04418099671602249,
0.010118262842297554,
0.04089735448360443,
0.0036823281552642584,
-0.0019195318454876542,
-0.023390546441078186,
0.0056666480377316475,
0.04729126766324043,
-0.060208726674318314,
... |
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 569 (AC 26461), is denied.
BORDEN and PALMER, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
John R. Williams, in support of the petition.
Anthony M. Fitzgerald and David S. Hardy, in opposition.
De... | [
-0.0105988048017025,
-0.020363638177514076,
-0.022424550727009773,
0.02056347392499447,
0.056696817278862,
0.010162997990846634,
0.04434359818696976,
-0.004678030498325825,
0.0033888027537614107,
-0.013741920702159405,
0.016020065173506737,
0.05985486879944801,
-0.01724463701248169,
0.0575... |
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court properly concluded that a loss of consortium claim is covered under the terms of a professional liability insurance policy covering claims that arise "because of bodily injury." The plaintiff, the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (associa... | [
-0.010139307007193565,
-0.05098054185509682,
-0.02299703285098076,
-0.0006103081395849586,
0.012522357515990734,
0.0035733324475586414,
0.01624484173953533,
0.029908131808042526,
0.015758970752358437,
-0.040123164653778076,
0.007463226094841957,
0.04421832785010338,
-0.027818890288472176,
... |
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 527 (AC 24295), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's appeal from the judgment revoking his probation was moot because the defendant was ser... | [
-0.015071040950715542,
-0.024796437472105026,
-0.03043852001428604,
-0.045268379151821136,
0.025007126852869987,
-0.005108977667987347,
0.0651690810918808,
0.01621999777853489,
-0.0045442283153533936,
-0.008415821008384228,
0.004318774677813053,
0.04292018339037895,
-0.043495047837495804,
... |
The petitioner Lesly Saintval's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 283 (AC 26434), is denied. | [
-0.017493877559900284,
-0.04883800446987152,
-0.012043873779475689,
0.012472344562411308,
0.0407259464263916,
0.012439473532140255,
0.048654623329639435,
-0.021366843953728676,
-0.004026907030493021,
-0.03630904480814934,
0.018622681498527527,
0.03986123576760292,
-0.028746472671628,
0.083... |
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 61 (AC 25567), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. | [
-0.007231618743389845,
-0.051393866539001465,
-0.0214201919734478,
0.01688031107187271,
0.06695442646741867,
0.015007177367806435,
0.027445301413536072,
0.0076028723269701,
-0.02513386681675911,
-0.008645851165056229,
-0.029467947781085968,
0.06126053258776665,
-0.042623016983270645,
0.070... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendants, ABC Stores, LLC (ABC), and Mohammed A. Sheikh, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Small Business Transportation, Inc., awarding it $37,880.87. The sole issue raised on appeal is the defendant's claim that the court improperly awarded the... | [
-0.019426384940743446,
-0.02149755135178566,
-0.027205850929021835,
0.029834894463419914,
0.050553835928440094,
0.02646086923778057,
0.013690105639398098,
0.024350283667445183,
0.01607074961066246,
-0.04173508659005165,
0.00761686684563756,
0.04446971416473389,
-0.0680500939488411,
0.04875... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action in two counts, claiming that they acquired title to a certain parcel known as the "Reserved for Road" parcel (parcel) by reason of adverse possession and that the defendants had abandoned any right, title and interest to the parcel. The plaintiffs sought a judgme... | [
-0.03307328000664711,
-0.041145872324705124,
-0.02668439783155918,
-0.00861968845129013,
0.057870231568813324,
0.015724826604127884,
0.014666473492980003,
0.009959852322936058,
0.0034201310481876135,
-0.06424718350172043,
0.00200621597468853,
0.008602146990597248,
-0.06485209614038467,
0.0... |
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The pro se plaintiff, Paul Robert, appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding a lesser amount in damages on his trespass claim against the defendants, Carmen Scarlata and Wanda Bermudez, than was sought by the plaintiff. The defendants initially had pleaded a special defense of adverse p... | [
0.010973641648888588,
-0.04141088202595711,
-0.007800649385899305,
0.002747640712186694,
0.0592815987765789,
0.01341491099447012,
0.06346012651920319,
0.004855283070355654,
0.016516204923391342,
-0.05031561851501465,
0.02922189235687256,
0.04386397823691368,
-0.06591552495956421,
0.0278217... |
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J. The
defendant, Kevin B. Logan, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for contempt and granting the motion for modification filed by the plaintiff, Heather V. Logan. He claims that the court improperly (1) failed to provide him with accommodations in accordance with the Am... | [
-0.010766874998807907,
-0.019528815522789955,
-0.01980614848434925,
-0.026478633284568787,
0.06897254288196564,
0.0015523560578003526,
0.0600648894906044,
0.0022214860655367374,
-0.01868700236082077,
-0.05685161426663399,
-0.02081208862364292,
0.02960226498544216,
-0.03394707664847374,
0.0... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Dameisha Moore, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-125b (a), accessory to criminal impersonation in violation of General Statutes § 53a-8 (a) and 53a-130 (a) (1), and failure to app... | [
-0.010062417015433311,
-0.060521502047777176,
-0.04243777319788933,
0.012718494981527328,
0.07782676815986633,
0.026033075526356697,
0.05985242500901222,
0.019002048298716545,
-0.0169029850512743,
-0.011780669912695885,
0.003595746820792556,
0.01970871165394783,
-0.04951535165309906,
0.037... |
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Eugene P. Mercer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action seeking monetary damages, attorney's fees and declaratory and injunctive relief for the allegedly discriminatory actions of the defendants, employees of the department of correction (department). On... | [
-0.027206342667341232,
-0.03609586879611015,
-0.07112374901771545,
0.01990492083132267,
0.046242304146289825,
0.019783461466431618,
0.05290037393569946,
-0.001618535490706563,
-0.021873459219932556,
-0.04134092107415199,
-0.013654595240950584,
0.04868810623884201,
-0.060444578528404236,
0.... |
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This appeal concerns the denial of a motion to intervene in an action involving the alleged sexual abuse of a child. Because that action has been withdrawn, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In the spring of 2005, the plaintiff, John Doe, commenced a civil action ... | [
-0.07234495133161545,
-0.037927549332380295,
-0.015782274305820465,
-0.016082456335425377,
-0.0013209370663389564,
0.009351696819067001,
0.06183109059929848,
-0.004290916956961155,
-0.014163739047944546,
-0.019115880131721497,
-0.02079799771308899,
0.059196144342422485,
-0.04193810001015663,... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Anthony Jones, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempted assault of a peace officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167c (a) (l) and 53a-49 (a), and possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 29-38. On ap... | [
-0.033273424953222275,
-0.025718536227941513,
-0.03848220780491829,
-0.014819740317761898,
0.017069246619939804,
0.018654607236385345,
0.04641084000468254,
0.01084329653531313,
0.014531528577208519,
-0.04414116218686104,
0.010361888445913792,
0.028933823108673096,
-0.07981430739164352,
0.0... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The plaintiff Sharyn N. D'Urso appeals from the trial court's judgment affirming the order of the Probate Court. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that an attorney may have a valid charging lien on the proceeds of litigation when the representation was based on an ho... | [
-0.05145062506198883,
-0.05127910152077675,
0.004914735909551382,
-0.006689794827252626,
0.04148321598768234,
0.003265582723543048,
0.029550550505518913,
0.017335934564471245,
0.02846447378396988,
-0.03917758911848068,
-0.013717439956963062,
0.06685736775398254,
-0.053124360740184784,
0.02... |
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, Edward Dalzell, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his conditional plea of nolo contendere to possession of narcotics with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a), possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a), ... | [
-0.02211841382086277,
-0.029337408021092415,
-0.04672352969646454,
0.011491109617054462,
0.059973057359457016,
0.006567446049302816,
0.058975182473659515,
0.003787289373576641,
0.011811659671366215,
-0.05846337974071503,
0.005402110982686281,
0.05885976552963257,
-0.053409334272146225,
0.0... |
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
In this action for breach of contract, the defendants, Kemper Construction Company, Inc. (Kemper), and its president, Theodore L. Kemp, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in accordance with a report by an attorney trial referee (referee) in favor of the plaintiff, TradeSource, Inc... | [
0.01776754856109619,
-0.0422719269990921,
-0.01899314485490322,
0.009991173632442951,
0.04422220215201378,
-0.0033673997968435287,
0.046669114381074905,
0.025335347279906273,
0.022358998656272888,
-0.050820525735616684,
-0.033845048397779465,
0.049462251365184784,
-0.06806442141532898,
0.0... |
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
Although the jury returned a verdict in their favor, the plaintiffs, Heather Medes and Dara Medes, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Geico Corporation, in this underinsured motorist action. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) admitted evide... | [
0.009294028393924236,
-0.024564595893025398,
-0.02001393772661686,
0.004358952399343252,
0.04471089690923691,
0.0357246957719326,
0.05590903013944626,
0.009173202328383923,
0.031828876584768295,
-0.013121601194143295,
0.03312092274427414,
0.06979115307331085,
-0.03505777567625046,
0.054302... |
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiffs, John Drabik and Ronald J. Rando, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs' action as moot. The plaintiffs specifically argue that the capable of repetition, yet evading review exception to the mootness doctrine applies to their otherwise moot action. We ... | [
0.00789003074169159,
-0.04337843507528305,
-0.037484388798475266,
0.006728070788085461,
0.040672753006219864,
0.01202109269797802,
0.043268755078315735,
0.02135617844760418,
-0.016729405149817467,
-0.021031327545642853,
-0.025902925059199333,
0.018230825662612915,
-0.0736863985657692,
0.03... |
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This court recently observed that "[t]he sad fact is that there is a difference between parental love and parental competence." In re Christina M., 90 Conn. App. 565, 575, 877 A.2d 941, cert. granted on other grounds, 276 Conn. 903, 884 A.2d 1024 (2005). In the present case, we again are required t... | [
-0.01820456050336361,
-0.027759408578276634,
-0.0037752611096948385,
0.01676257513463497,
0.031117333099246025,
0.01852484606206417,
0.053367480635643005,
0.031870901584625244,
0.018029624596238136,
-0.04600100591778755,
0.0355173721909523,
0.001151606091298163,
-0.047212280333042145,
0.03... |
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The plaintiff, James E. Sullivan, administrator of the estate of James P. Sullivan, the plaintiffs decedent (decedent), brought this wrongful death action against the defendant Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, alleging that the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain and to provide adequ... | [
-0.029031962156295776,
-0.031857628375291824,
-0.032208528369665146,
0.019057726487517357,
0.08105752617120743,
-0.0022122212685644627,
0.06837804615497589,
0.010094618424773216,
0.013579733669757843,
-0.05821705237030983,
0.005178738851100206,
0.010152391158044338,
-0.06928631663322449,
0... |
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiff tenant, United Social and Mental Health Services, Inc., appeals, and the defendant landlord, Alma Rodowicz, cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that it was a holdover tenant at the expiration of its lea... | [
-0.006040399428457022,
-0.052694711834192276,
-0.01282720360904932,
-0.008208504877984524,
0.06313324719667435,
0.0038392660208046436,
0.03961620107293129,
0.008617784827947617,
0.004412896931171417,
-0.03367936238646507,
-0.014462489634752274,
0.006042955908924341,
-0.0717046856880188,
0.... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.